Laguna Beach election 2026 · Official ballot position 2 of 9 · Nonpartisan candidate profile
Ashley Cintas: Laguna Beach City Council Candidate 2026
Non-incumbentDoes not currently hold a Laguna Beach City Council seat.
Ballot position 2. Candidate for one of three at-large seats (every Laguna Beach voter may vote for these seats; they are not assigned to geographic districts) in the November 3, 2026 election.
Laguna Beach business owner whose campaign emphasizes fiscal management, measurable outcomes, wildfire preparedness, emergency medical access and data-informed tourism.
Last reviewed October 19, 2026. Official ballot position follows the City Clerk’s August 13, 2026 candidate list, published after the Secretary of State randomized alphabet drawing.
Candidate dashboard
Ashley Cintas at a glance
Career background
Laguna Beach business owner with nearly two decades of experience in operations, hospitality and business leadership. In her candidate response, Cintas says she has…
Review experienceTop issues
Public safety and hospital access, Housing and land use, Traffic, parking and transit, Budget and capital projects, Environment,…
See sourced positionsPublic appearances
2026 candidate forums and debates
The City currently lists nine forums hosted by independent community organizations. The hosts have affirmed that candidates were offered equal time and opportunity to appear. A listing does not establish that every candidate has confirmed attendance.
All currently listed forums have concluded. Past forum records remain available below.
Past forums9 completed
Laguna Beach Chamber of Commerce
6:00–9:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordView official flyerWatch video, answers and transcriptSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsOfficial Chamber forum details
South Laguna Civic Association
6:00 p.m. (doors open 5:30 p.m.) · Laguna Beach Community Recreation Center (former St. Catherine’s School)
30516 South Coast Highway, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordWatch recording and compare answersSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsOfficial SLCA event details
Laguna Canyon Conservancy
5:30–8:30 p.m. (panel 6:30–8:30 p.m.) · Bridge Hall at Neighborhood Congregational Church
340 St Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordWatch videos, answers and transcriptsSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsOfficial event details
Laguna Beach Arts Alliance
9:00 a.m.–noon (reception 8:30 a.m.) · Forum Theater at Festival of Arts
650 Laguna Canyon Road, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordOpen forum replaySearch transcriptCandidate timestampsArts Alliance information
Greater Laguna Beach GOP
6:00–9:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordOpen forum replaySearch transcriptCandidate timestampsGLBGOP event and viewing information
Advocates for Laguna Residents
6:00–8:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordWatch video, answers and transcriptSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsAdvocates for Laguna Residents website (currently Launching Soon)
Canyon Alliance of Neighborhoods Defense Organization (CANDO)
6:30 p.m. · Online via Zoom
Completed September 10. Watch the full recording, compare all seven answers from each candidate and search the complete transcript.Forum recordFull forum videoSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsCANDO forum page
KXFM
5:30 p.m. potluck; 6:30 p.m. forum · Neighborhood Congregational Church, Bridge Hall
340 St Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Compare KXFM candidate answersKXFM forum page
KXFM has published a 10-question candidate-results summary and an official Facebook reel from the September 8 forum. So Laguna has not verified a complete audio or video replay of the full program.
Village Laguna
6:00 p.m.; recording 1:57:49 · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordOpen forum replaySearch transcriptCandidate timestampsVillage Laguna forum information
Open the So Laguna events calendarVerify the City’s current schedule
Village Laguna forum · August 31, 2026
What Ashley Cintas said at the candidate forum
Five concise, neutral summaries link to the exact moments in the full recording. They are not ratings, endorsements or a substitute for watching each answer in context.
- Downtown plan and historic preservationOpposed increasing downtown height, called for defined costs, timelines and deliverables, and favored locating housing opportunities elsewhere.
- Business revenue and visitor costsConnected commercial vacancies with sales-tax performance and called for current visitor data and a strategy favoring longer stays and greater local spending.
- Wildfire and evacuationCalled for a realistic, citywide stress test of evacuation plans to identify bottlenecks before an emergency.
- Church affordable-housing proposalSupported affordable housing but opposed the amount contributed and called for an independent study.
- Tourism managementCalled for updated data on visitor origins, stays and spending before setting policy, with an emphasis on overnight and longer-stay visitors.
CANDO forum · September 10, 2026
What Ashley Cintas said about Laguna Canyon
Seven concise, neutral summaries link to the candidate’s complete answers. They are not ratings, endorsements or a substitute for watching each response in context.
- Use of a $10 million grantWould devote the grant to wildfire readiness, including a complete stress test of evacuation, communications and the City’s separate emergency-response measures working together.
- Affordable housing locationsSupported affordable housing but said sites should be evaluated individually for traffic, evacuation, cost, long-term liability, unit count and the residents the project would serve.
- Creek and wildlife corridorsCalled the creek and corridors essential to the canyon ecosystem and said wildlife protection should be considered at the beginning of development and public-property planning.
- Small-scale and rural developmentDefined the goal as preserving canyon character and open space, while calling for clearer objective standards so applicants and residents are not left with subjective rules.
- Helping Community DevelopmentProposed interviewing staff about broken processes, fixing tools and communication, clarifying standards, then establishing measurable expectations for customer service and turnaround times.
- Residents and long-term stewardshipSaid every resident deserves to be heard and that officials must clearly explain the evidence, tradeoffs and reasoning when a long-term decision differs from immediate public requests.
- Open-space fundingWas open to a $300,000 annual allocation if it is tied to preservation, habitat, wildfire and erosion benefits, partner funding and realistic long-term maintenance costs.
Advocates forum · September 15, 2026
What Ashley Cintas said at the Advocates forum
Six concise, neutral topic summaries link to the exact moments in the complete recording. They are not ratings, endorsements or a substitute for watching each answer in context.
- Measure E and term limitsSupported term limits, saying institutional knowledge matters but councilmembers should accomplish the work within a defined period and make room for fresh perspectives.
- Hospital and emergency careCalled for emergency medical access, an emergency room and inpatient beds, with state, county and health-care stakeholders working in parallel rather than waiting on Providence.
- St. Catherine’s propertySaid the City should first define the decision process, traffic effects, long-term operating cost and funding source before choosing housing, recreation or another use.
- Capital projects and financial oversightSupported restoring residents and financial professionals to an independent audit body and cutting discretionary contracts, consultants and lower-priority capital spending before seeking new revenue.
- Candidate priorityIdentified long-range fiscal discipline as her leading issue and called for planning five, ten and twenty years ahead for infrastructure, emergencies and other obligations.
- Closing prioritiesPromised transparent, outcome-focused management with a funding source, timeline, accountable owner and measurable result for major commitments, while prioritizing emergency care and fiscal planning.
Arts Alliance · September 26, 2026
What Ashley Cintas said at the Arts Alliance forum
Nine arts discussion rounds, plus opening and closing statements. These are attributed paraphrases with video timestamps; the recording remains authoritative.
Read nine answers and both statements
Opening statement
Draws on arts, hospitality and business experience to propose stronger artist–business partnerships, new funding sources, opportunities for students and measurable results.
Watch opening · 16:44 ↗- 1. About the Arts AllianceSees the Alliance as a unified voice connecting organizations, galleries, artists, the community and City Council.
- 2. Arts involvement and recent eventsDescribes attending the Pageant of the Masters, visiting North Laguna galleries and exhibiting local artists in her restaurant, with plans to rotate work and involve other businesses.
- 3. Parking in the arts districtSupports more parking but would first improve use of existing peripheral parking and trolleys. Does not identify a location or endorse a particular new structure.
- 4. Why the arts matterHighlights the concentration of arts institutions and opportunities for people to pursue creative interests alongside other professions.
- 5. Residents and visitorsEmphasizes visitor quality and overnight stays rather than greater summer volume. Wants data-based shoulder-season programming and easier access to arts venues.
- 6. Artist housing and workspacesSupports artist housing but wants a plan, repayment details and eligibility standards. Would prioritize existing land, zoning and permitting changes and private or LCAD partnerships.
- 7. More use of the Festival groundsSuggests a larger farmers market, TEDx-style educational programs, artist series and small-scale conventions with a wider draw.
- 8. New arts ideasEnvisions the town as a living gallery connecting artists with restaurants, hotels and shops that need artwork and creative services.
- 9. Arts on the PromenadeWants the Arts Alliance to curate Promenade arts rather than City Council or City Hall, and argues for more local artist participation.
Closing statement
Calls for artist careers, student opportunities and sustainable institutions. Wants City Hall to connect partners, remove barriers, find outside resources and measure results.
Watch closing · 1:47:35 ↗Compare all nine candidates and search the forum transcript →
Chamber forum · October 15, 2026
What Ashley Cintas said at the Chamber forum
Debate coverage updated October 16. Source-linked paraphrases; candidates answered different questions. Silence is not recorded as a policy position.
Read 11 indexed responses and statements
Opening statement
Cites business operations and budget experience and calls for understanding connected impacts, setting priorities and finishing funded work.
Watch statement · 7:45 ↗- 1. Economic developmentCalls for City involvement in helping property owners update aging, inaccessible buildings, faster permitting, and coordination with brokers to bring suitable businesses to available spaces.
- 2. Housing locationsWants updated population and housing data presented to the state before committing to housing numbers. Opposes new downtown development and favors examining vacant or aging properties elsewhere.
- 4. Financial accountabilityCalls financial conflict a prioritization and accountability failure. Says staff and Council should resolve disagreements and deliver reliable financial information rather than repeat election-year promises.
- 6. Promenade lessonsCalls for transparency on bids, costs, timelines and tree decisions. Says construction delays hurt downtown and argues that complete communication is a matter of leadership integrity.
- 9. Council term limitsSupports term limits, arguing that incumbents’ name recognition and campaign spending make it harder for challengers to compete.
- 10. Planning and building processWants an implementation plan for objective standards, stronger project management and better communication across departments. Says consistent rules and clear responsibility would improve approvals.
- 12. Construction, flooding and infrastructureSupports a recovery plan for businesses affected by successive construction projects and reviewing Zone 4 timing. Challenges stormwater delays and advocates earlier use of coastal-adaptation grants and completing funded projects.
- 13. Vacant storefrontsProposes bringing owners and brokers together and fast-tracking building upgrades. Supports a vacancy tax after an allowance for owners to fill spaces, with the exact timeframe still to be determined.
- 14. City management and legal spendingOpposes adding a COO-type position and says she would eliminate it. Argues that tracking initiatives and holding departments accountable are existing city-manager responsibilities.
- 15. Mayor selectionRedirects the discussion toward conflict-of-interest safeguards in City business rather than personal allegations. Does not give a direct answer on electing a mayor.
- 16. Civility and political harassmentCalls for Council members to publicly oppose intimidation and personal attacks and take responsibility for the political climate, while thanking Rounaghi for making contact privately.
Closing statement
Calls for leadership measured by completed results, citing connected challenges in finances, storefronts, emergency care and infrastructure.
Watch statement · 2:07:19 ↗South Laguna Civic Association · October 6, 2026
What Ashley Cintas said at the forum
Source-linked paraphrases from the published recording. Candidate claims are attributed; automatic captions may contain errors.
Read 12 forum answers and closing statement
- 1. Emergency care and a possible taxOpposes a hospital tax and wants independent work rather than reliance on Providence. Also raises concerns about the newly reported outside committee contribution supporting the incumbents.
- 2. Hospital land useFavors keeping medical use as much as possible, with independent analysis and community input on possible parking use.
- 3. Catalina lots and park spaceSupports additional park space, with community input and consideration of donations, purchase costs and ongoing maintenance. Also asks the incumbents to denounce election corruption in response to outside spending.
- 4. South Coast Water District voting rightsCommits to making restoration a top priority and delivering a result rather than another election promise.
- 5. South Laguna’s share of City spendingWants transparent figures on revenue and allocations, infrastructure and safety priorities, and completion of funded projects.
- 6. Beach infrastructure and fundingWants an accounting of the beach-transfer funds and more hotel-tax revenue used for beach safety, facilities, sanitation and completed improvements.
- 7. Commercial parking requirementsWould require evidence on parking demand, traffic, safety, evacuation and neighborhood impacts before making changes, rather than decisions based on a developer’s immediate needs.
- 8. Public restroomsOpposes placing restrooms in neighborhoods. Wants existing facilities improved in high-demand areas before buying new property.
- 9. Community Recreation CenterWould like it retained as a financially sound community center, while considering different uses on part of the site, including affordable housing, with residents involved.
- 10. Community Garden acquisitionSupports keeping the garden, reviewing past negotiations and pursuing nonprofit or government funding, acquisition or a long-term lease.
- 11. Beach patrol and park rangersSupports restoring beach patrol and reviewing staffing, deployment and spending so South Laguna beaches receive more coverage.
- 12. Gelson’s and neighborhood grocery accessMakes filling the site with a grocery store a priority. Suggests subleasing and legal review of anti-competitive issues, drawing on commercial lease experience.
Closing statement
Offers further conversations with residents and challenges the incumbents to denounce corruption in response to the outside committee contribution. Her allegations are presented as her statements, not established findings.
Watch statement · 1:51:50 ↗Compare candidates, review the questions and search the transcript →
Laguna Canyon Conservancy · September 28, 2026
What Ashley Cintas said at the Laguna Canyon Conservancy forum
Paraphrased answer summaries with direct video timestamps, plus the candidate’s closing statement. Candidate claims are attributed statements; the recordings remain authoritative.
Read 9 indexed answers and the closing statement
- 1. Impressions of Laguna CanyonValues returning from the freeway to nature and preserved wilderness; prefers the canyon’s darkness to added lighting despite night-driving challenges.
- 2. Regional conservation and NCCPCalls for early coordination across local, county, state and federal stakeholders and a financially responsible long-term preservation plan.
- 3. Acquiring additional open spaceSupports grants, county partnerships, philanthropy and land trusts; wants management and maintenance responsibilities settled before spending or accepting funds.
- 4. Tree preservation and Ocean AvenueSupports preservation and expert, science-based review before removals; wants public disclosure and a replacement plan established in advance.
- 5. Irvine–Laguna Wildlife CorridorStrongly supports the corridor and wants wildlife connectivity incorporated into project design from the beginning, alongside funding and management plans.
- 6. Invasive plants and agency partnershipsSupports coordinated invasive-species control conducted in a way that protects habitat and the ecosystem.
- 7. Fuel modification and native habitatWants fire agencies and environmental organizations involved together so mitigation protects people while preserving plants, wildlife and open space as much as possible.
- 8. Enrolling city open space in the Nature ReserveSupports enrollment subject to a clear plan for responsibilities, retained city management and public input before agreement.
- 9. Partnerships and dependable fundingPoints to relationships with state leaders and her experience securing private, public and government financing; wants stakeholders involved early.
Closing statement
Calls for experts, financing, long-term planning and transparency to protect open space, oceans and wildlife while addressing safety and infrastructure.
Watch statement · 1:24 in the statements video ↗ · Full panel · 1:29:03 ↗Compare all candidates, watch both videos and search the transcripts →
GLBGOP forum · September 23, 2026
What Ashley Cintas said at the GLBGOP forum
Selected question and answer highlights from the two-part recording. The links open the original video at the answer; these summaries do not cover every exchange.
- Opening: What experience and priorities would you bring?Cited her local restaurant and management experience and called for measurable results.
- Are residents included early enough in major city projects?Asked for more public hearings and a dashboard showing decisions, spending and reasons.
- Should the city review public access to City Hall services?Questioned whether added city staff have produced better service and called for review of workloads.
- How should Laguna Beach address visitor impacts?Asked for a strategy based on visitor data before increasing enforcement spending.
- How should Council scrutinize Promenade construction bids?Said Council should question each line item and scrutinize spending of taxpayer money.
- What would you do about vacant commercial storefronts?Cited poor vacancy visibility, building condition and barriers to tenant improvements.
- What would you review or reduce before raising taxes?Proposed reviewing discretionary contracts, consultants, lower-priority capital and staffing against actual budget performance.
See 37 rapid-round answers
- Do you support Measure E term limits?Yes
- Would you post Council agendas at least seven days before meetings?Yes
- Should completed city projects credit taxpayers instead of the mayor and Council on plaques?Yes
- Does the city pay too much for outside consultants?Yes
- Do you approve of the 10-year Visit Laguna agreement?No
- Would you turn the library site into a parking structure?No
- Would you build a new parking structure behind the police station or at the City Hall entrance?No · Opposed new parking.
- Would you spend $141 million or more to underground Laguna Canyon Road?No
- Would you still underground Laguna Canyon Road if Edison hardened the poles at no cost?No
- Should the city purchase Laguna Canyon Road?No
- Should the city purchase Coast Highway within city limits?No
- Do you support a downtown plan replacing historic buildings with denser housing and reduced parking?No
- Do you support the proposed development of Ocean Avenue?No
- Do you support adding 675 homes downtown and in the canyon?No
- Would you meet regularly with the school board on shared issues?Yes
- Would you present an alternate Promenade plan in response to the petition by 873 residents?Yes
- Was the $2.7 million purchase of the Ti Amo former fire-station site a mistake?Yes
- Do you support the NCC/St. Anne’s housing project funding?No
- Would you use city tax dollars to help build housing developments in Laguna?No
- Would you charge a nominal trolley fare to offset operating costs?Yes
- Should voters directly elect the mayor?Yes
- Would you tax second homes or vacation homes?No
- Do you support rent control in Laguna Beach?No
- Would you impose a city transfer tax on property sales over $5 million?No
- Do you support increasing the sales tax?No
- Do you support another increase in the hotel occupancy tax?No
- Would you raise the business-license tax based on gross sales or profits?No
- Would you allow open-container alcohol on the Promenade?No
- Would you rent out the public Promenade for private events?Yes
- Would you increase building heights downtown?No
- Would you require a public vote on civic projects costing over $5 million?Yes
- Would you give commercial landlords $10,000 or more for exterior improvements?No
- Would you increase administrative staffing?No
- Would you raise fines for illegal parking, littering, vehicle noise and beach drinking to at least $100?Yes
- Would you support more alcohol licenses in Laguna Beach?No
- Have you had a joint venture or business relationship with a housing developer in the past two years?No
- Have you invested in or profited from a housing project in the past two years?No
Most admired person in politics: Ronald Reagan. Part 2 · 21:20 ↗
Experience
Career background and qualifications
Laguna Beach business owner with nearly two decades of experience in operations, hospitality and business leadership. In her candidate response, Cintas says she has opened businesses across the country and managed large budgets and teams. These experience claims are candidate-supplied and are not presented as independently verified employment history.
Community connection
Cintas says her involvement in Laguna Beach grew from opening a local business, after which she began attending public meetings, reviewing City budgets and projects, asking questions and speaking with residents.
Read the fuller biographical summary
Ashley Cintas is a Laguna Beach business owner with nearly two decades of experience in operations, hospitality and business leadership. She says she has opened businesses across the country, managed large budgets and teams, and spent her career being accountable for execution and results. Her involvement in Laguna grew from opening a business here and then attending meetings, reviewing budgets and projects, and speaking with residents. She is running on a practical, independent and forward-thinking approach focused on fiscal management, public safety and Laguna Beach’s long-term future.
In Laguna Beach and beyond
Local business and community roles
Cintas owns OTO Sushi, the public-facing Laguna Beach restaurant operated through the hospitality business identified in her Form 700, and serves on the Visit Laguna Beach board.
OTO Sushi
Owner and local restaurateur
Cintas opened OTO Sushi in Laguna Beach in 2024. Her Form 700 identifies the underlying restaurant and hospitality business as Epicurean Hospitality Collective.
Visit Laguna Beach
Board member
Visit Laguna Beach’s current board directory lists Ash Cintas as an OTO Sushi owner and board member.
Only current or clearly labeled former roles supported by public sources are included. A Form 700 income source is not treated as a candidate-owned business without additional evidence. Submit a correction or verification.
Candidate-provided material
From Ashley Cintas’s official candidate statement
The following is So Laguna’s concise summary of the candidate’s own ballot statement. It describes the candidate’s claims and priorities; it is not an endorsement or independent verification.
Cintas emphasizes operational leadership, long-range decision-making and listening before acting. Her stated priorities are fiscal responsibility, public safety—especially wildfire preparedness—and a strong local economy that preserves Laguna Beach’s character.
View the statement background and priority list
Background described in the statement
Cintas says she has nearly two decades of experience leading multi-department operations, managing complex budgets, creating jobs and building businesses. She identifies opening Oto Sushi in Laguna Beach as a commitment to the community.
Priorities emphasized
- Fiscal responsibility
- Wildfire preparedness and public safety
- A strong local economy
- Preservation of Laguna Beach’s character
- Resident listening and participation
- Long-term planning rather than short-term reactions
Direct candidate response
Ashley Cintas answers So Laguna’s introductory questions
Received September 9, 2026. The campaign supplied the answers below in response to the same introductory questionnaire sent to all nine candidates. The responses are published in full, with only formatting and typographic normalization; they are candidate statements, not an endorsement or independent verification by So Laguna.
Why are you running for Laguna Beach City Council?
I didn't move to Laguna planning to run for City Council.
I got involved because of my experience opening a business here. Then I started attending meetings, looking at budgets and projects, asking questions, and talking to residents. And the more I learned, the more I realized that Laguna doesn't have a shortage of people who care about problems. What I think we are missing is enough focus on what happens next.
Caring about a problem isn't a solution. Pointing out a problem isn't a solution. Taking responsibility for solving it is.
That is where I think I am very different from both the current Council and some of the other candidates.
I hear a lot about protecting Laguna. I completely agree that we need to protect Laguna's character, charm, coastline, open space and neighborhoods. Those are some of the reasons all of us chose to live here.
But protecting Laguna cannot stop there.
Protecting Laguna means protecting residents' quality of life.
It means protecting our local business community.
It means protecting our firefighters, police officers and other public employees by making responsible financial decisions so we can meet our long-term pension obligations.
It means protecting the City's investments by having a plan for how we are going to pay for, operate, and maintain something before we spend millions of dollars buying it.
It means recognizing when revenues are declining and developing a real strategy to control expenses and diversify revenue instead of continually looking to residents and businesses for another tax or fee.
And protecting Laguna from wildfire doesn't mean only checking items off a mitigation list. It means testing our entire system, communications, alerts, evacuation, traffic and emergency response, together before we are facing an actual disaster.
Protecting Laguna means thinking beyond the next budget cycle. It means asking what the decisions we make today will mean 10, 15 and 20 years from now.
It means having a real tourism strategy, not just adding more enforcement tools. It means planning for parking and affordable housing before constraints get worse. It means investing in our arts community. It means transparency and public accountability.
And most importantly, protecting Laguna means taking the loss of our emergency room seriously. We should not lose months before organizing a meaningful response to something that directly affects the health and safety of this community.
All of that is protecting Laguna.
I am running because I think we need more forward-thinking and much more accountability for outcomes.
For almost two decades, I have worked in environments where I couldn't just identify a problem or talk about what should happen. I had to come back with a plan, determine who was responsible, understand what it would cost, establish a timeline, and then actually deliver it.
I also believe leadership means being willing to make the right decision even when it is not the easiest answer politically. I am not going to change my position because it is an election cycle or because a different answer is more convenient in the moment. Residents should know where I stand, why I stand there, and that I will make decisions based on facts and what I believe is best for Laguna long term.
That is the mindset I want to bring to City Council.
What are your three highest priorities?
My three priorities are forward thinking, fiscal management, and fire and public safety.
Forward thinking means asking before we make a major commitment: What is the cost? What is the timeline? Who owns it? How will we measure success? And what long-term obligation are we creating?
Fiscal management means prioritizing, controlling expenses, and understanding what is and is not working before asking residents and businesses to pay more.
And fire and public safety means making sure all the systems we have invested in actually work together. During an emergency, residents will not experience separate wildfire action items. They will experience one system. I want us to stress test that entire system and find the bottlenecks before a disaster does.
What is one thing about Laguna Beach that City Hall must protect?
The quality of life of the people who actually live here.
That includes protecting our coastline, open space, neighborhoods, arts, architecture and the character that makes Laguna unique.
But it also means making sure residents can still move around their own city, access essential services, feel safe, support local businesses and afford to remain part of this community.
I don’t want Laguna to become a place that is beautifully preserved but increasingly difficult to actually live in.
The decisions we make about tourism, parking, housing, public safety, infrastructure and City finances should all come back to one question: Does this make Laguna a better place for the people who call it home?
You cannot protect Laguna's character without also protecting the community that creates that character.
And I don't believe protecting Laguna means refusing to change anything. The world around us is going to change whether we like it or not.
The responsibility of City Council is to think ahead and manage that change so that twenty years from now Laguna still feels like Laguna.
Protecting our future requires more than protecting our past.
What is one thing about how the City operates that most needs to change?
We need to stop measuring activity and start measuring outcomes.
A study is an action. A committee/ad hoc/meeting is an action. Buying a property is an action. Purchasing new technology is an action.
The question I will keep asking is: Did it actually solve the problem?
Every major City commitment should have a funding source, a timeline, measurable deliverables, a responsible party and a long-term plan.
That is how I have operated throughout my career, and I believe City Hall needs much more of that discipline and follow-through.
How should Laguna Beach balance residents' quality of life, community and environmental character, local businesses, and tourism?
I don’t think these interests have to be in conflict.
Residents’ quality of life should come first. Our coastline, neighborhoods and character need to be protected. Our local businesses also need to be able to survive because they are part of what makes Laguna a real community.
And tourism matters to our economy.
The question should not simply be, “How do we get more visitors?” It should be: What kind of tourism creates the greatest benefit for Laguna with the least impact on residents?
That means using better data to understand who is coming, when they are coming, where they are spending, what areas are most impacted and what Laguna is actually receiving in return.
Then we can build a strategy around quality over volume, stronger shoulder seasons and a healthier balance between residents, businesses and visitors.
Issues and positions
Where Ashley Cintas stands
A quick, source-linked summary of the candidate’s questionnaire responses, public statements and forum answers. Use the source chips to read the questionnaire or watch the answer at its exact timestamp. Tap an issue to open the summary.
Public safety and hospital access
Cintas identifies public safety and wildfire preparedness as priorities. On her campaign’s “Laguna By the Numbers” page, she calls for independent analysis of Laguna’s emergency-care needs and says credible alternatives, funding sources and partnerships should be exhausted before accepting the loss of the local emergency room.
Housing and land use
At the Advocates forum, Cintas said the City should define traffic effects, full costs, a funding source and long-term operating responsibility before selecting housing, recreation or another use for St. Catherine’s.
Traffic, parking and transit
At the Village Laguna forum, Cintas called for updated data on visitor origins, stays and spending before setting policy, with an emphasis on overnight and longer-stay visitors.
Budget and capital projects
Cintas emphasizes fiscal responsibility and experience managing complex budgets. Her campaign argues that the city should measure recurring spending, pursue underused revenue opportunities and demonstrate results before seeking higher taxes or fees.
Environment, beaches and wildfire
Cintas prioritizes wildfire preparedness and preserving Laguna Beach’s character. Her campaign describes emergency readiness as part of the city’s long-term financial and operational planning.
Arts, business and village character
She calls for a strong local economy while preserving community character. Her campaign proposes filling existing vacancies with more resident-serving businesses and seeking greater economic value from existing tourism through longer stays and stronger off-season demand rather than attracting more visitors.
Transparency and participation
Cintas says council should listen before deciding and weigh facts, alternatives, costs and tradeoffs. Her campaign calls for updated visitor data, measurable objectives and public reporting of results.
Arts Alliance: arts-district parking
Supports more parking but would first improve use of existing peripheral parking and trolleys. Does not identify a location or endorse a particular new structure.
Arts Alliance: artist housing and studios
Supports artist housing but wants a plan, repayment details and eligibility standards. Would prioritize existing land, zoning and permitting changes and private or LCAD partnerships.
Arts Alliance: arts on the Promenade
Wants the Arts Alliance to curate Promenade arts rather than City Council or City Hall, and argues for more local artist participation.
Official election records
Ashley Cintas candidate filings
These records are published by the Laguna Beach City Clerk. Campaign-finance totals below are summarized separately so amendments and reporting periods are not double counted.
- Form 501 candidate intention statement
- Form 410 statement of organization · filed Aug. 1, 2026
- Form 497 · $7,000 contribution from Ashley Cintas · received Aug. 21, 2026
- Form 497 · $7,000 contribution from Ashley Cintas · received Sept. 19, 2026
- Amended Form 410 · committee ID 1494093 · Secretary of State received 2026-08-23; City received October 12, 2026
- Form 460 · through 2026-09-19
- Search the City’s current campaign-filing portal
Public financial disclosure
Form 700 summary
The filing reports ownership of a Laguna Beach restaurant and hospitality company and a commercial leasehold associated with the business.
So Laguna summarizes these public filings to identify relevant business, employment and property interests. Reported ranges are not estimates of net worth or proof of a conflict, and residential addresses and private third-party names are omitted.
View reported business, property and investment details
Businesses and income
- Epicurean Hospitality Collective — owner; restaurant and hospitality company in Laguna Beach; business interest reported over $1 million; gross business income reported over $100,000.
Real-property interests
- Commercial restaurant-premises leasehold in Laguna Beach with eight years remaining, reported in the $100,001-to-$1-million range.
Investments and other disclosures
- The filing marks no reportable single source providing $10,000 or more to the business.
Filing reviewed: August 6, 2026 candidate Form 700 · View the official City eFile record
Public questions
Ask Ashley Cintas a question
Submit a policy or public-service question. So Laguna moderates submissions for relevance and civility, and clearly labels candidate replies after verification.
How this works: Questions are reviewed before publication for relevance, civility, privacy and duplication. So Laguna may edit for length or clarity and will mark substantive edits. Published answers identify whether they came from the candidate, campaign or So Laguna editor.
-
-
From Ashley Cintas:
Yes, I believe we need to bring the City’s ongoing operating costs down. But I don’t think the responsible answer is to pick a number and cut every department equally. That usually ends up hurting services without fixing why costs keep growing.
My starting target would be to find at least $2 million in recurring savings or costs we can avoid in the first budget cycle. That is about 2% of the General Fund, so it is meaningful without being reckless.I would start with outside contracts, consultants, software subscriptions and professional services. We should be able to clearly answer what we are paying for, what was delivered and whether it produced a result. If we can’t answer those questions, the contract should be renegotiated or eliminated.
I would also review administrative staffing and management. That doesn’t mean immediately laying people off. It means not automatically filling every vacant position or adding new ones without first asking whether the work is still needed or could be done more efficiently.
We also need to look honestly at our growing list of projects. We keep adding new projects without finishing the ones already underway. I would prioritize public safety, infrastructure and maintenance, then give each project a real budget, timeline and person responsible for delivering it.
I would not begin by cutting police, fire, lifeguards, wildfire preparedness or essential maintenance. I would begin with duplication, overhead, underperforming contracts and projects that do not have clear priorities or measurable results.
I also support bringing independent financial experts back onto the audit committee. Council members should not be the only people reviewing financial decisions they helped make. Residents deserve independent oversight and simple quarterly reporting that shows what we planned to spend, what we actually spent and what we accomplished.
We also need to manage the budget throughout the year, not just approve it once and move on. A cut on paper is only a plan. Each quarter, Council should review budget versus actual spending by department, understand where costs are running over or under budget, update the year-end forecast and take corrective action when something is off track. The outcome is not what we budgeted. It is what we actually spent and what residents received for that money.
I also want to be honest that pension, insurance and other required costs are continuing to rise. Finding $2 million in savings may keep the budget from growing rather than make the final number exactly $2 million lower. What matters is that we reduce unnecessary ongoing costs and stop using money meant for capital projects to support regular operations.
We also cannot cut our way to a stronger future. We need to grow revenue by supporting local businesses, filling vacant storefronts and using current data to attract visitors who stay longer and spend locally.
Before City Hall asks residents and businesses for more taxes, it needs to show that it has gone through the budget line by line and made responsible decisions with the money it already has.
Ashley
-
-
Good afternoon Ashley: I have written before with this question but have not heard back from you. I would like to know how long you and your family have lived permanently in Laguna. Thank you. Charlotte
-
From Ashely Cintas:
Hi Charlotte,I’m sorry I missed your earlier message. I have been in Laguna for about two years.
I grew up spending summers throughout Orange and San Diego counties, including time in Laguna, but I chose to make Laguna my permanent home as an adult. This is where I want to build my future and raise a family.
I understand why residency length matters. Longtime residents bring history, perspective, and an understanding of what makes Laguna special. We need that knowledge, just as we need leaders who are thinking seriously about the next 10, 15, and 20 years. Respecting Laguna’s past and preparing for its future should not be competing priorities.
I invested my life savings in opening Oto Sushi downtown, employ more than 40 people locally, and spend nearly every day speaking with residents, employees, and other business owners. I see firsthand how decisions made at City Hall affect people’s lives, livelihoods, and the future of our community.
I believe leadership should be measured not only by how long someone has lived here, but also by what they have contributed, the experience they bring, and whether they are prepared to do the work and be accountable for results. That is what I hope to bring to the Council.
Thank you for asking, and again, I apologize for not responding sooner.
Ashley
-
Ask Ashley Cintas a public question
Campaign finance
Ashley Cintas campaign finance
This live module displays only figures reviewed against official Laguna Beach campaign filings.
Identifies Ashley Cintas as treasurer and Jen Slater as assistant treasurer. Secretary of State receipt: 2026-08-23; City receipt: October 12, 2026. These are administrative organization amendments, not new October 15 receipts or expenditures. Form 410 reports no contributions, spending, cash or debt.
Latest reviewed reporting period: through September 19, 2026. View the official Form 460 filing.
2026 calendar-year totals through Sept. 19; this filing covers Jan. 1–Sept. 19. Form 460 Schedule B identifies Ashley Cintas's two $7,000 advances, reported earlier on Forms 497, as candidate loans. Total contributions include those loans; outstanding debt also includes $3,090.90 in unpaid bills. The loans are not additional donations.
Campaign-finance figures are compiled from public filings submitted to the City of Laguna Beach. Filings can be amended and recent transactions may not yet appear in periodic reports. So Laguna omits residential street addresses and links summaries to the original record.
Public voting record
Ashley Cintas voting record
Ashley Cintas is not currently a member of the body they are seeking to join, so they have no incumbent voting record for this race. This is not a judgment about other public or appointed roles.
Record and accountability
Public record and verification
This candidate does not have a Laguna Beach City Council voting record. Direct questionnaire answers are published above; So Laguna will add verified public-service records when relevant.
Search official campaign filings · City Clerk election information
Primary sources
Sources used for this profile
- Campaign website
- Campaign policy and city-data page
- Campaign Instagram
- Advocates for Laguna Residents candidate forum video and local transcript — September 15, 2026
- Arts Alliance forum video, candidate answers and captions — September 26, 2026
- Official candidate statement filed with the City Clerk
- Candidate Form 700 in the City’s official eFile system
- Candidate-submitted So Laguna questionnaire received September 9, 2026
- OTO Sushi — Best of Laguna Beach profile
- Visit Laguna Beach — board directory
- City of Laguna Beach 2026 General Municipal Election
Quick answers
Frequently asked questions
Is Ashley Cintas running for Laguna Beach City Council in 2026?
Yes. Ashley Cintas qualified for the November 3, 2026 ballot and appears in position 2 of nine candidates for three at-large City Council seats.
Is Ashley Cintas an incumbent?
No. Ashley Cintas is running as a non-incumbent candidate.
What businesses and community organizations is Ashley Cintas connected to?
Cintas owns OTO Sushi, the public-facing Laguna Beach restaurant operated through the hospitality business identified in her Form 700, and serves on the Visit Laguna Beach board. Each listed role includes its supporting public source.
What economic interests did Ashley Cintas disclose?
The filing reports ownership of a Laguna Beach restaurant and hospitality company and a commercial leasehold associated with the business. The complete filing is available through the City’s public eFile system.
How does So Laguna verify this profile?
So Laguna prioritizes official City records, campaign-controlled pages, public filings and dated primary-source statements. Unknown positions are labeled rather than inferred.
Where can I compare every candidate?
Use the Laguna Beach election voter guide for the live candidate comparison and campaign-finance table in official ballot order.
Do you believe that the City budget should be reduced?
If yes, how much do you think should be cut?
Where do you propose to make the cuts?