Laguna Beach election 2026 · Official ballot position 2 of 9 · Nonpartisan candidate profile

Ashley Cintas: Laguna Beach City Council Candidate 2026

Non-incumbentDoes not currently hold a Laguna Beach City Council seat.

Ballot position 2. Candidate for one of three at-large seats (every Laguna Beach voter may vote for these seats; they are not assigned to geographic districts) in the November 3, 2026 election.

Laguna Beach business owner whose campaign emphasizes fiscal management, measurable outcomes, wildfire preparedness, emergency medical access and data-informed tourism.

Last reviewed October 19, 2026. Official ballot position follows the City Clerk’s August 13, 2026 candidate list, published after the Secretary of State randomized alphabet drawing.

Reported and maintained by Michael Kovach for So Laguna. Editorial and sourcing standard · Submit a correction

Ashley Cintas, 2026 Laguna Beach City Council candidate
Photo courtesy of the Ashley Cintas campaign.

Candidate dashboard

Ashley Cintas at a glance

Council statusNot on CouncilNon-incumbent — does not currently hold a Council seat
Ballot position2 of 9Three citywide, at-large seats
Positions tracked10Sourced issue categories
Latest finance$26,763.00Form 460 total through Sep. 19, 2026 · includes $14,000.00 in loansView filing
Voting recordNo Council recordNot currently on City CouncilView record
Public disclosureForm 700 on fileEconomic-interest filingView summary

Career background

Laguna Beach business owner with nearly two decades of experience in operations, hospitality and business leadership. In her candidate response, Cintas says she has…

Review experience

Top issues

Public safety and hospital access, Housing and land use, Traffic, parking and transit, Budget and capital projects, Environment,…

See sourced positions

Public appearances

2026 candidate forums and debates

The City currently lists nine forums hosted by independent community organizations. The hosts have affirmed that candidates were offered equal time and opportunity to appear. A listing does not establish that every candidate has confirmed attendance.

All currently listed forums have concluded. Past forum records remain available below.

Past forums9 completed
Map
Past forumOfficial organizer flyerVideo, answers and transcript · 2:15:58Searchable transcriptCandidate timestamps

Laguna Beach Chamber of Commerce

6:00–9:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651

Completed October 15. Watch the 2:15:58 recording, explore 16 discussion topics and 80 indexed responses, and search the captions. Seven candidates participated; Sue Kempf and Mark Orgill were absent due to reported illness. The moderator read Orgill’s submitted statement.
Map
Past forumVideo and answer indexSearchable transcriptCandidate timestamps

South Laguna Civic Association

6:00 p.m. (doors open 5:30 p.m.) · Laguna Beach Community Recreation Center (former St. Catherine’s School)
30516 South Coast Highway, Laguna Beach, CA 92651

Completed October 6 at the Community Recreation Center. Watch the recording, compare 12 questions and eight candidates’ answers, and search the archived captions. Edward Bayuk was absent; the moderator read his submitted closing statement.
Map
Past forumFull panel and closing statementsSearchable transcriptCandidate timestamps

Laguna Canyon Conservancy

5:30–8:30 p.m. (panel 6:30–8:30 p.m.) · Bridge Hall at Neighborhood Congregational Church
340 St Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA 92651

Completed September 28 at Bridge Hall. The Conservancy released the full panel and a separate closing-statements edit on October 1. Compare all nine candidates’ indexed environmental answers and statements with timestamp links, and search both locally archived automatic-caption transcripts. Caption gaps are identified explicitly.
Map
Past forumFull video, answers and transcriptSearchable transcriptCandidate timestamps

Laguna Beach Arts Alliance

9:00 a.m.–noon (reception 8:30 a.m.) · Forum Theater at Festival of Arts
650 Laguna Canyon Road, Laguna Beach, CA 92651

Completed September 26. Watch the Arts Alliance’s full recording, compare all nine candidates’ answers to nine arts discussion questions and their opening and closing statements, and search the locally archived automatic-caption transcript. Tom Johnson moderated; LBArtsAlliance published the recording.
Map
Past forumTwo full videosSearchable transcriptCandidate timestamps

Greater Laguna Beach GOP

6:00–9:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651

Completed September 23 at Council Chambers. Both parts of the recording are embedded below, with searchable local copies of automatic captions and selected, timestamped candidate answer summaries. All nine City Council candidates spoke. GLBGOP hosted; NimbleGov PAC uploaded the videos.
Map
Past forumVideo, answers and transcript · 2:06:21Searchable transcriptCandidate timestamps

Advocates for Laguna Residents

6:00–8:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651

Completed September 15. Watch the full recording, compare six timestamped topic summaries for each of the eight participating candidates, search the locally archived transcript and review Advocates for Laguna Residents’ current campaign-finance filing. Sue Kempf did not participate.
Past forumVideo, answers and transcript · 1:59:24Searchable transcriptCandidate timestamps

Canyon Alliance of Neighborhoods Defense Organization (CANDO)

6:30 p.m. · Online via Zoom

Completed September 10. Watch the full recording, compare all seven answers from each candidate and search the complete transcript.
Map
Past forum

KXFM

5:30 p.m. potluck; 6:30 p.m. forum · Neighborhood Congregational Church, Bridge Hall
340 St Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA 92651

The KXFM forum was held September 8 as a joint City Council and School Board candidate program. KXFM later published a 10-question yes-or-no summary for eight participating City Council candidates and a short Facebook reel. So Laguna has not verified a complete replay of the full program.

KXFM has published a 10-question candidate-results summary and an official Facebook reel from the September 8 forum. So Laguna has not verified a complete audio or video replay of the full program.

Open the So Laguna events calendarVerify the City’s current schedule

Village Laguna forum · August 31, 2026

What Ashley Cintas said at the candidate forum

Five concise, neutral summaries link to the exact moments in the full recording. They are not ratings, endorsements or a substitute for watching each answer in context.

Watch the forum and search the transcript

CANDO forum · September 10, 2026

What Ashley Cintas said about Laguna Canyon

Seven concise, neutral summaries link to the candidate’s complete answers. They are not ratings, endorsements or a substitute for watching each response in context.

  • Use of a $10 million grantWould devote the grant to wildfire readiness, including a complete stress test of evacuation, communications and the City’s separate emergency-response measures working together.
  • Affordable housing locationsSupported affordable housing but said sites should be evaluated individually for traffic, evacuation, cost, long-term liability, unit count and the residents the project would serve.
  • Creek and wildlife corridorsCalled the creek and corridors essential to the canyon ecosystem and said wildlife protection should be considered at the beginning of development and public-property planning.
  • Small-scale and rural developmentDefined the goal as preserving canyon character and open space, while calling for clearer objective standards so applicants and residents are not left with subjective rules.
  • Helping Community DevelopmentProposed interviewing staff about broken processes, fixing tools and communication, clarifying standards, then establishing measurable expectations for customer service and turnaround times.
  • Residents and long-term stewardshipSaid every resident deserves to be heard and that officials must clearly explain the evidence, tradeoffs and reasoning when a long-term decision differs from immediate public requests.
  • Open-space fundingWas open to a $300,000 annual allocation if it is tied to preservation, habitat, wildfire and erosion benefits, partner funding and realistic long-term maintenance costs.

Watch the CANDO forum and search the transcript

Advocates forum · September 15, 2026

What Ashley Cintas said at the Advocates forum

Six concise, neutral topic summaries link to the exact moments in the complete recording. They are not ratings, endorsements or a substitute for watching each answer in context.

  • Measure E and term limitsSupported term limits, saying institutional knowledge matters but councilmembers should accomplish the work within a defined period and make room for fresh perspectives.
  • Hospital and emergency careCalled for emergency medical access, an emergency room and inpatient beds, with state, county and health-care stakeholders working in parallel rather than waiting on Providence.
  • St. Catherine’s propertySaid the City should first define the decision process, traffic effects, long-term operating cost and funding source before choosing housing, recreation or another use.
  • Capital projects and financial oversightSupported restoring residents and financial professionals to an independent audit body and cutting discretionary contracts, consultants and lower-priority capital spending before seeking new revenue.
  • Candidate priorityIdentified long-range fiscal discipline as her leading issue and called for planning five, ten and twenty years ahead for infrastructure, emergencies and other obligations.
  • Closing prioritiesPromised transparent, outcome-focused management with a funding source, timeline, accountable owner and measurable result for major commitments, while prioritizing emergency care and fiscal planning.

Watch the forum and search the local transcript

Arts Alliance · September 26, 2026

What Ashley Cintas said at the Arts Alliance forum

Nine arts discussion rounds, plus opening and closing statements. These are attributed paraphrases with video timestamps; the recording remains authoritative.

Read nine answers and both statements

Opening statement

Draws on arts, hospitality and business experience to propose stronger artist–business partnerships, new funding sources, opportunities for students and measurable results.

Watch opening · 16:44 ↗
  • 1. About the Arts AllianceSees the Alliance as a unified voice connecting organizations, galleries, artists, the community and City Council.
  • 2. Arts involvement and recent eventsDescribes attending the Pageant of the Masters, visiting North Laguna galleries and exhibiting local artists in her restaurant, with plans to rotate work and involve other businesses.
  • 3. Parking in the arts districtSupports more parking but would first improve use of existing peripheral parking and trolleys. Does not identify a location or endorse a particular new structure.
  • 4. Why the arts matterHighlights the concentration of arts institutions and opportunities for people to pursue creative interests alongside other professions.
  • 5. Residents and visitorsEmphasizes visitor quality and overnight stays rather than greater summer volume. Wants data-based shoulder-season programming and easier access to arts venues.
  • 6. Artist housing and workspacesSupports artist housing but wants a plan, repayment details and eligibility standards. Would prioritize existing land, zoning and permitting changes and private or LCAD partnerships.
  • 7. More use of the Festival groundsSuggests a larger farmers market, TEDx-style educational programs, artist series and small-scale conventions with a wider draw.
  • 8. New arts ideasEnvisions the town as a living gallery connecting artists with restaurants, hotels and shops that need artwork and creative services.
  • 9. Arts on the PromenadeWants the Arts Alliance to curate Promenade arts rather than City Council or City Hall, and argues for more local artist participation.

Closing statement

Calls for artist careers, student opportunities and sustainable institutions. Wants City Hall to connect partners, remove barriers, find outside resources and measure results.

Watch closing · 1:47:35 ↗

Compare all nine candidates and search the forum transcript →

Chamber forum · October 15, 2026

What Ashley Cintas said at the Chamber forum

Debate coverage updated October 16. Source-linked paraphrases; candidates answered different questions. Silence is not recorded as a policy position.

Read 11 indexed responses and statements

Opening statement

Cites business operations and budget experience and calls for understanding connected impacts, setting priorities and finishing funded work.

Watch statement · 7:45 ↗
  • 1. Economic developmentCalls for City involvement in helping property owners update aging, inaccessible buildings, faster permitting, and coordination with brokers to bring suitable businesses to available spaces.
  • 2. Housing locationsWants updated population and housing data presented to the state before committing to housing numbers. Opposes new downtown development and favors examining vacant or aging properties elsewhere.
  • 4. Financial accountabilityCalls financial conflict a prioritization and accountability failure. Says staff and Council should resolve disagreements and deliver reliable financial information rather than repeat election-year promises.
  • 6. Promenade lessonsCalls for transparency on bids, costs, timelines and tree decisions. Says construction delays hurt downtown and argues that complete communication is a matter of leadership integrity.
  • 9. Council term limitsSupports term limits, arguing that incumbents’ name recognition and campaign spending make it harder for challengers to compete.
  • 10. Planning and building processWants an implementation plan for objective standards, stronger project management and better communication across departments. Says consistent rules and clear responsibility would improve approvals.
  • 12. Construction, flooding and infrastructureSupports a recovery plan for businesses affected by successive construction projects and reviewing Zone 4 timing. Challenges stormwater delays and advocates earlier use of coastal-adaptation grants and completing funded projects.
  • 13. Vacant storefrontsProposes bringing owners and brokers together and fast-tracking building upgrades. Supports a vacancy tax after an allowance for owners to fill spaces, with the exact timeframe still to be determined.
  • 14. City management and legal spendingOpposes adding a COO-type position and says she would eliminate it. Argues that tracking initiatives and holding departments accountable are existing city-manager responsibilities.
  • 15. Mayor selectionRedirects the discussion toward conflict-of-interest safeguards in City business rather than personal allegations. Does not give a direct answer on electing a mayor.
  • 16. Civility and political harassmentCalls for Council members to publicly oppose intimidation and personal attacks and take responsibility for the political climate, while thanking Rounaghi for making contact privately.

Closing statement

Calls for leadership measured by completed results, citing connected challenges in finances, storefronts, emergency care and infrastructure.

Watch statement · 2:07:19 ↗

Compare Chamber responses and search the transcript →

South Laguna Civic Association · October 6, 2026

What Ashley Cintas said at the forum

Source-linked paraphrases from the published recording. Candidate claims are attributed; automatic captions may contain errors.

Read 12 forum answers and closing statement

Closing statement

Offers further conversations with residents and challenges the incumbents to denounce corruption in response to the outside committee contribution. Her allegations are presented as her statements, not established findings.

Watch statement · 1:51:50 ↗

Compare candidates, review the questions and search the transcript →

Laguna Canyon Conservancy · September 28, 2026

What Ashley Cintas said at the Laguna Canyon Conservancy forum

Paraphrased answer summaries with direct video timestamps, plus the candidate’s closing statement. Candidate claims are attributed statements; the recordings remain authoritative.

Read 9 indexed answers and the closing statement

Compare all candidates, watch both videos and search the transcripts →

GLBGOP forum · September 23, 2026

What Ashley Cintas said at the GLBGOP forum

Selected question and answer highlights from the two-part recording. The links open the original video at the answer; these summaries do not cover every exchange.

See 37 rapid-round answers

Most admired person in politics: Ronald Reagan. Part 2 · 21:20 ↗

Watch both parts and search the transcripts →

Experience

Career background and qualifications

Laguna Beach business owner with nearly two decades of experience in operations, hospitality and business leadership. In her candidate response, Cintas says she has opened businesses across the country and managed large budgets and teams. These experience claims are candidate-supplied and are not presented as independently verified employment history.

Community connection

Cintas says her involvement in Laguna Beach grew from opening a local business, after which she began attending public meetings, reviewing City budgets and projects, asking questions and speaking with residents.

Read the fuller biographical summary

Ashley Cintas is a Laguna Beach business owner with nearly two decades of experience in operations, hospitality and business leadership. She says she has opened businesses across the country, managed large budgets and teams, and spent her career being accountable for execution and results. Her involvement in Laguna grew from opening a business here and then attending meetings, reviewing budgets and projects, and speaking with residents. She is running on a practical, independent and forward-thinking approach focused on fiscal management, public safety and Laguna Beach’s long-term future.

In Laguna Beach and beyond

Local business and community roles

Cintas owns OTO Sushi, the public-facing Laguna Beach restaurant operated through the hospitality business identified in her Form 700, and serves on the Visit Laguna Beach board.

Only current or clearly labeled former roles supported by public sources are included. A Form 700 income source is not treated as a candidate-owned business without additional evidence. Submit a correction or verification.

Candidate-provided material

From Ashley Cintas’s official candidate statement

Read the official statement

The following is So Laguna’s concise summary of the candidate’s own ballot statement. It describes the candidate’s claims and priorities; it is not an endorsement or independent verification.

Cintas emphasizes operational leadership, long-range decision-making and listening before acting. Her stated priorities are fiscal responsibility, public safety—especially wildfire preparedness—and a strong local economy that preserves Laguna Beach’s character.

View the statement background and priority list

Background described in the statement

Cintas says she has nearly two decades of experience leading multi-department operations, managing complex budgets, creating jobs and building businesses. She identifies opening Oto Sushi in Laguna Beach as a commitment to the community.

Priorities emphasized

  • Fiscal responsibility
  • Wildfire preparedness and public safety
  • A strong local economy
  • Preservation of Laguna Beach’s character
  • Resident listening and participation
  • Long-term planning rather than short-term reactions

Direct candidate response

Ashley Cintas answers So Laguna’s introductory questions

Received September 9, 2026. The campaign supplied the answers below in response to the same introductory questionnaire sent to all nine candidates. The responses are published in full, with only formatting and typographic normalization; they are candidate statements, not an endorsement or independent verification by So Laguna.

Why are you running for Laguna Beach City Council?

I didn't move to Laguna planning to run for City Council.

I got involved because of my experience opening a business here. Then I started attending meetings, looking at budgets and projects, asking questions, and talking to residents. And the more I learned, the more I realized that Laguna doesn't have a shortage of people who care about problems. What I think we are missing is enough focus on what happens next.

Caring about a problem isn't a solution. Pointing out a problem isn't a solution. Taking responsibility for solving it is.

That is where I think I am very different from both the current Council and some of the other candidates.

I hear a lot about protecting Laguna. I completely agree that we need to protect Laguna's character, charm, coastline, open space and neighborhoods. Those are some of the reasons all of us chose to live here.

But protecting Laguna cannot stop there.

Protecting Laguna means protecting residents' quality of life.

It means protecting our local business community.

It means protecting our firefighters, police officers and other public employees by making responsible financial decisions so we can meet our long-term pension obligations.

It means protecting the City's investments by having a plan for how we are going to pay for, operate, and maintain something before we spend millions of dollars buying it.

It means recognizing when revenues are declining and developing a real strategy to control expenses and diversify revenue instead of continually looking to residents and businesses for another tax or fee.

And protecting Laguna from wildfire doesn't mean only checking items off a mitigation list. It means testing our entire system, communications, alerts, evacuation, traffic and emergency response, together before we are facing an actual disaster.

Protecting Laguna means thinking beyond the next budget cycle. It means asking what the decisions we make today will mean 10, 15 and 20 years from now.

It means having a real tourism strategy, not just adding more enforcement tools. It means planning for parking and affordable housing before constraints get worse. It means investing in our arts community. It means transparency and public accountability.

And most importantly, protecting Laguna means taking the loss of our emergency room seriously. We should not lose months before organizing a meaningful response to something that directly affects the health and safety of this community.

All of that is protecting Laguna.

I am running because I think we need more forward-thinking and much more accountability for outcomes.

For almost two decades, I have worked in environments where I couldn't just identify a problem or talk about what should happen. I had to come back with a plan, determine who was responsible, understand what it would cost, establish a timeline, and then actually deliver it.

I also believe leadership means being willing to make the right decision even when it is not the easiest answer politically. I am not going to change my position because it is an election cycle or because a different answer is more convenient in the moment. Residents should know where I stand, why I stand there, and that I will make decisions based on facts and what I believe is best for Laguna long term.

That is the mindset I want to bring to City Council.

What are your three highest priorities?

My three priorities are forward thinking, fiscal management, and fire and public safety.

Forward thinking means asking before we make a major commitment: What is the cost? What is the timeline? Who owns it? How will we measure success? And what long-term obligation are we creating?

Fiscal management means prioritizing, controlling expenses, and understanding what is and is not working before asking residents and businesses to pay more.

And fire and public safety means making sure all the systems we have invested in actually work together. During an emergency, residents will not experience separate wildfire action items. They will experience one system. I want us to stress test that entire system and find the bottlenecks before a disaster does.

What is one thing about Laguna Beach that City Hall must protect?

The quality of life of the people who actually live here.

That includes protecting our coastline, open space, neighborhoods, arts, architecture and the character that makes Laguna unique.

But it also means making sure residents can still move around their own city, access essential services, feel safe, support local businesses and afford to remain part of this community.

I don’t want Laguna to become a place that is beautifully preserved but increasingly difficult to actually live in.

The decisions we make about tourism, parking, housing, public safety, infrastructure and City finances should all come back to one question: Does this make Laguna a better place for the people who call it home?

You cannot protect Laguna's character without also protecting the community that creates that character.

And I don't believe protecting Laguna means refusing to change anything. The world around us is going to change whether we like it or not.

The responsibility of City Council is to think ahead and manage that change so that twenty years from now Laguna still feels like Laguna.

Protecting our future requires more than protecting our past.

What is one thing about how the City operates that most needs to change?

We need to stop measuring activity and start measuring outcomes.

A study is an action. A committee/ad hoc/meeting is an action. Buying a property is an action. Purchasing new technology is an action.

The question I will keep asking is: Did it actually solve the problem?

Every major City commitment should have a funding source, a timeline, measurable deliverables, a responsible party and a long-term plan.

That is how I have operated throughout my career, and I believe City Hall needs much more of that discipline and follow-through.

How should Laguna Beach balance residents' quality of life, community and environmental character, local businesses, and tourism?

I don’t think these interests have to be in conflict.

Residents’ quality of life should come first. Our coastline, neighborhoods and character need to be protected. Our local businesses also need to be able to survive because they are part of what makes Laguna a real community.

And tourism matters to our economy.

The question should not simply be, “How do we get more visitors?” It should be: What kind of tourism creates the greatest benefit for Laguna with the least impact on residents?

That means using better data to understand who is coming, when they are coming, where they are spending, what areas are most impacted and what Laguna is actually receiving in return.

Then we can build a strategy around quality over volume, stronger shoulder seasons and a healthier balance between residents, businesses and visitors.

Issues and positions

Where Ashley Cintas stands

A quick, source-linked summary of the candidate’s questionnaire responses, public statements and forum answers. Use the source chips to read the questionnaire or watch the answer at its exact timestamp. Tap an issue to open the summary.

Public safety and hospital access

Cintas identifies public safety and wildfire preparedness as priorities. On her campaign’s “Laguna By the Numbers” page, she calls for independent analysis of Laguna’s emergency-care needs and says credible alternatives, funding sources and partnerships should be exhausted before accepting the loss of the local emergency room.

Housing and land use

At the Advocates forum, Cintas said the City should define traffic effects, full costs, a funding source and long-term operating responsibility before selecting housing, recreation or another use for St. Catherine’s.

Traffic, parking and transit

At the Village Laguna forum, Cintas called for updated data on visitor origins, stays and spending before setting policy, with an emphasis on overnight and longer-stay visitors.

Budget and capital projects

Cintas emphasizes fiscal responsibility and experience managing complex budgets. Her campaign argues that the city should measure recurring spending, pursue underused revenue opportunities and demonstrate results before seeking higher taxes or fees.

Environment, beaches and wildfire

Cintas prioritizes wildfire preparedness and preserving Laguna Beach’s character. Her campaign describes emergency readiness as part of the city’s long-term financial and operational planning.

Arts, business and village character

She calls for a strong local economy while preserving community character. Her campaign proposes filling existing vacancies with more resident-serving businesses and seeking greater economic value from existing tourism through longer stays and stronger off-season demand rather than attracting more visitors.

Transparency and participation

Cintas says council should listen before deciding and weigh facts, alternatives, costs and tradeoffs. Her campaign calls for updated visitor data, measurable objectives and public reporting of results.

Arts Alliance: arts-district parking

Supports more parking but would first improve use of existing peripheral parking and trolleys. Does not identify a location or endorse a particular new structure.

Arts Alliance: artist housing and studios

Supports artist housing but wants a plan, repayment details and eligibility standards. Would prioritize existing land, zoning and permitting changes and private or LCAD partnerships.

Arts Alliance: arts on the Promenade

Wants the Arts Alliance to curate Promenade arts rather than City Council or City Hall, and argues for more local artist participation.

Official election records

Ashley Cintas candidate filings

These records are published by the Laguna Beach City Clerk. Campaign-finance totals below are summarized separately so amendments and reporting periods are not double counted.

Public financial disclosure

Form 700 summary

The filing reports ownership of a Laguna Beach restaurant and hospitality company and a commercial leasehold associated with the business.

So Laguna summarizes these public filings to identify relevant business, employment and property interests. Reported ranges are not estimates of net worth or proof of a conflict, and residential addresses and private third-party names are omitted.

View reported business, property and investment details

Businesses and income

  • Epicurean Hospitality Collective — owner; restaurant and hospitality company in Laguna Beach; business interest reported over $1 million; gross business income reported over $100,000.

Real-property interests

  • Commercial restaurant-premises leasehold in Laguna Beach with eight years remaining, reported in the $100,001-to-$1-million range.

Investments and other disclosures

  • The filing marks no reportable single source providing $10,000 or more to the business.

Filing reviewed: August 6, 2026 candidate Form 700 · View the official City eFile record

Public questions

Ask Ashley Cintas a question

Submit a policy or public-service question. So Laguna moderates submissions for relevance and civility, and clearly labels candidate replies after verification.

How this works: Questions are reviewed before publication for relevance, civility, privacy and duplication. So Laguna may edit for length or clarity and will mark substantive edits. Published answers identify whether they came from the candidate, campaign or So Laguna editor.

  1. Do you believe that the City budget should be reduced?
    If yes, how much do you think should be cut?
    Where do you propose to make the cuts?

    1. From Ashley Cintas:

      Yes, I believe we need to bring the City’s ongoing operating costs down. But I don’t think the responsible answer is to pick a number and cut every department equally. That usually ends up hurting services without fixing why costs keep growing.
      My starting target would be to find at least $2 million in recurring savings or costs we can avoid in the first budget cycle. That is about 2% of the General Fund, so it is meaningful without being reckless.

      I would start with outside contracts, consultants, software subscriptions and professional services. We should be able to clearly answer what we are paying for, what was delivered and whether it produced a result. If we can’t answer those questions, the contract should be renegotiated or eliminated.

      I would also review administrative staffing and management. That doesn’t mean immediately laying people off. It means not automatically filling every vacant position or adding new ones without first asking whether the work is still needed or could be done more efficiently.

      We also need to look honestly at our growing list of projects. We keep adding new projects without finishing the ones already underway. I would prioritize public safety, infrastructure and maintenance, then give each project a real budget, timeline and person responsible for delivering it.

      I would not begin by cutting police, fire, lifeguards, wildfire preparedness or essential maintenance. I would begin with duplication, overhead, underperforming contracts and projects that do not have clear priorities or measurable results.

      I also support bringing independent financial experts back onto the audit committee. Council members should not be the only people reviewing financial decisions they helped make. Residents deserve independent oversight and simple quarterly reporting that shows what we planned to spend, what we actually spent and what we accomplished.

      We also need to manage the budget throughout the year, not just approve it once and move on. A cut on paper is only a plan. Each quarter, Council should review budget versus actual spending by department, understand where costs are running over or under budget, update the year-end forecast and take corrective action when something is off track. The outcome is not what we budgeted. It is what we actually spent and what residents received for that money.

      I also want to be honest that pension, insurance and other required costs are continuing to rise. Finding $2 million in savings may keep the budget from growing rather than make the final number exactly $2 million lower. What matters is that we reduce unnecessary ongoing costs and stop using money meant for capital projects to support regular operations.

      We also cannot cut our way to a stronger future. We need to grow revenue by supporting local businesses, filling vacant storefronts and using current data to attract visitors who stay longer and spend locally.

      Before City Hall asks residents and businesses for more taxes, it needs to show that it has gone through the budget line by line and made responsible decisions with the money it already has.

      Ashley

  2. Good afternoon Ashley: I have written before with this question but have not heard back from you. I would like to know how long you and your family have lived permanently in Laguna. Thank you. Charlotte

    1. From Ashely Cintas:
      Hi Charlotte,

      I’m sorry I missed your earlier message. I have been in Laguna for about two years.

      I grew up spending summers throughout Orange and San Diego counties, including time in Laguna, but I chose to make Laguna my permanent home as an adult. This is where I want to build my future and raise a family.

      I understand why residency length matters. Longtime residents bring history, perspective, and an understanding of what makes Laguna special. We need that knowledge, just as we need leaders who are thinking seriously about the next 10, 15, and 20 years. Respecting Laguna’s past and preparing for its future should not be competing priorities.

      I invested my life savings in opening Oto Sushi downtown, employ more than 40 people locally, and spend nearly every day speaking with residents, employees, and other business owners. I see firsthand how decisions made at City Hall affect people’s lives, livelihoods, and the future of our community.

      I believe leadership should be measured not only by how long someone has lived here, but also by what they have contributed, the experience they bring, and whether they are prepared to do the work and be accountable for results. That is what I hope to bring to the Council.

      Thank you for asking, and again, I apologize for not responding sooner.

      Ashley

Ask Ashley Cintas a public question

Your email will not be published. Questions appear only after editorial review. Do not include private addresses, phone numbers or allegations without primary documentation.

Campaign finance

Ashley Cintas campaign finance

This live module displays only figures reviewed against official Laguna Beach campaign filings.

Campaign committee registrationAshley Cintas for Laguna Council 2026 · FPPC ID 1494093

Identifies Ashley Cintas as treasurer and Jen Slater as assistant treasurer. Secretary of State receipt: 2026-08-23; City receipt: October 12, 2026. These are administrative organization amendments, not new October 15 receipts or expenditures. Form 410 reports no contributions, spending, cash or debt.

Read official Form 410 · 3 pages
Total contributions$26,763.00
Total expenditures$8,855.61
Cash on hand$20,998.29
Outstanding debt$17,090.90
Loans/self-funding$14,000.00
Unitemized contributions$213.00

Latest reviewed reporting period: through September 19, 2026. View the official Form 460 filing.

2026 calendar-year totals through Sept. 19; this filing covers Jan. 1–Sept. 19. Form 460 Schedule B identifies Ashley Cintas's two $7,000 advances, reported earlier on Forms 497, as candidate loans. Total contributions include those loans; outstanding debt also includes $3,090.90 in unpaid bills. The loans are not additional donations.

Campaign-finance figures are compiled from public filings submitted to the City of Laguna Beach. Filings can be amended and recent transactions may not yet appear in periodic reports. So Laguna omits residential street addresses and links summaries to the original record.

Public voting record

Ashley Cintas voting record

No record in this office.

Ashley Cintas is not currently a member of the body they are seeking to join, so they have no incumbent voting record for this race. This is not a judgment about other public or appointed roles.

Laguna Beach City Hall, where the City Council conducts public meetings
Laguna Beach City Hall. So Laguna links candidate records to official City filings, minutes and election information.

Record and accountability

Public record and verification

This candidate does not have a Laguna Beach City Council voting record. Direct questionnaire answers are published above; So Laguna will add verified public-service records when relevant.

Search official campaign filings · City Clerk election information

Primary sources

Sources used for this profile

Quick answers

Frequently asked questions

Is Ashley Cintas running for Laguna Beach City Council in 2026?

Yes. Ashley Cintas qualified for the November 3, 2026 ballot and appears in position 2 of nine candidates for three at-large City Council seats.

Is Ashley Cintas an incumbent?

No. Ashley Cintas is running as a non-incumbent candidate.

What businesses and community organizations is Ashley Cintas connected to?

Cintas owns OTO Sushi, the public-facing Laguna Beach restaurant operated through the hospitality business identified in her Form 700, and serves on the Visit Laguna Beach board. Each listed role includes its supporting public source.

What economic interests did Ashley Cintas disclose?

The filing reports ownership of a Laguna Beach restaurant and hospitality company and a commercial leasehold associated with the business. The complete filing is available through the City’s public eFile system.

How does So Laguna verify this profile?

So Laguna prioritizes official City records, campaign-controlled pages, public filings and dated primary-source statements. Unknown positions are labeled rather than inferred.

Where can I compare every candidate?

Use the Laguna Beach election voter guide for the live candidate comparison and campaign-finance table in official ballot order.

Editorial method: This is a neutral voter-information profile, not an endorsement. Candidate claims are attributed, material corrections are dated, and private personal information is excluded. Read the editorial and sourcing standards.