Laguna Beach election 2026 · Official ballot position 2 of 5 · Nonpartisan candidate profile
Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal: Laguna Beach School Board Candidate 2026
Non-incumbent; attorney, parent and longtime LBUSD volunteer
Ballot designation: Attorney/Parent. Candidate for one of three at-large LBUSD Board seats in the November 3 election.
Last reviewed September 29, 2026. Official order and designation follow the Orange County Registrar of Voters candidate list.
Candidate dashboard
Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal at a glance
Public appearances
2026 candidate forums and debates
This School Board schedule includes KXFM’s completed joint forum and the PTA Council’s October 7 school-board-only forum. The PTA Council says all five School Board candidates were invited; a listing does not confirm attendance.
All currently listed forums have concluded. Past forum records remain available below.
Past forums2 completed
Laguna Beach Unified Council of PTAs
6:00–7:30 p.m. · Thurston Middle School Library
2100 Park Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordView official flyerWatch recording and compare answersSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsLaguna Beach PTA Council information
KXFM
5:30 p.m. potluck; 6:30 p.m. forum · Neighborhood Congregational Church, Bridge Hall
340 St Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Compare KXFM candidate answersKXFM forum page
KXFM has published a 10-question candidate-results summary and an official Facebook reel from the September 8 forum. So Laguna has not verified a complete audio or video replay of the full program.
Open the So Laguna events calendarLaguna Beach PTA Council information
PTA School Board forum · October 7, 2026
What Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal said at the forum
Source-linked paraphrases from the published recording. Candidate claims are attributed; automatic captions may contain errors.
Read 11 forum answers
- 1. Community representationWould involve community stakeholders in high-level policy, use evidence and keep student outcomes central to decisions.
- 2. Student voice and graduation decisionsSays graduation location should be a site-level decision informed by students and school leadership, rather than a Board decision.
- 3. Special education and inclusionNotes legal and confidentiality limits but sees opportunities for empathy, dignity, inclusion and continued conversations so parents feel less alone in navigating services.
- 4. Classroom technology and AISupports age-appropriate use, with younger students practicing foundational skills and older students learning about AI bias, privacy, limitations and responsible evaluation.
- 5. Evidence for technology policyWould rely on specialist staff recommendations, student input and recurring Board discussions or study sessions as research and technology change.
- 6. District strengths and improvementsWants to look beyond high averages to whether every student is challenged and connected to an adult. Supports coherent K–12 curriculum, future readiness and whole-child support.
- 7. Measure A and facilitiesExplicitly supports Measure A, describing $83 million for facilities, potential state matching funds, fire hardening and repairs, with a citizens oversight committee.
- 8. PTA, SchoolPower and community organizationsDescribes PTA leadership at Top of the World and Thurston, communications and yearbook work, dance teaching and SchoolPower trusteeship. Would continue community service on the Board.
- 9. Teacher and staff trustWould build on longstanding volunteer relationships by listening first, asking what staff need and allocating resources to help them serve students.
- 10. Student well-being and school safetySupports existing counselors, social workers and school resource officers. Highlights a pilot connecting each student with an adult who believes in their success and would use staff recommendations to guide resources.
- 11. Personal accomplishmentsIs proud of being a mother and showing her children that community service is a family value.
Compare candidates, review the questions and search the transcript →
Who they are
Background and experience
LBUSD parent, attorney, longtime PTA leader and community advocate. Her candidate response describes more than 20 years advising organizations on governance, complex decision-making and fiduciary responsibility, along with service as a PTA president, on PTA Council, as a SchoolPower trustee and as a co-founder and first president of FUEL.
Voter case
Why voters may consider Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal
- More than 20 years of governance, complex decision-making and fiduciary experience
- Extensive PTA, SchoolPower and parent-volunteer experience
- Focus on collaborative decision-making, independent judgment and student growth
- Supports transparent oversight with a clear distinction between Board governance and district management
This is a neutral summary of potentially favorable qualifications, not an endorsement.
Due diligence
Questions voters may want answered
- What student-growth measures would she prioritize across the academic spectrum?
- What specific changes would make Board meetings and supporting materials more accessible?
- How would she prioritize Measure A projects if costs exceed available bond funding?
Candidate priorities
What Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal emphasizes
- Trust and collaborative decision-making
- Academic growth and appropriate challenge for every student
- AI readiness, critical thinking and student well-being
Summarized from candidate-controlled materials and the supplied campaign announcement; wording is condensed and attributed, not independently validated policy analysis.
Direct candidate response
Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal answers So Laguna’s School Board questionnaire
Received August 28, 2026. The candidate supplied the answers below in response to the same questionnaire sent to all five School Board candidates. The responses are published in full, with only formatting and typographic normalization; they are candidate statements, not an endorsement or independent verification by So Laguna.
Why are you running for the LBUSD Board, and what experience or perspective would you bring to the position?
I’m running because I believe LBUSD is an exceptional district that can be even stronger when decisions are collaborative, educators are respected, families are heard, and students remain at the center.
I’m an LBUSD parent, attorney, longtime PTA leader, and community advocate. I bring more than 20 years of experience advising organizations on governance, complex decision-making, and fiduciary responsibility, along with years of hands-on involvement in our schools. I would bring a collaborative, thoughtful, and student-centered approach to the Board.
What are your three highest priorities for LBUSD, and what measurable progress should voters expect during your term?
Strong schools depend on trust and collaboration among educators, staff, families, district leadership, and the Board. I will work to rebuild those relationships through collaborative decision-making that respects professional expertise and keeps students at the center.
I want every student to be appropriately challenged and growing. LBUSD’s strong district-wide performance gives us an excellent foundation, but we should continue looking closely at student growth across the academic spectrum and building on the great work already happening in our classrooms.
Finally, we must prepare students for a rapidly changing world while supporting the whole child. That means strong writing and critical-thinking skills, thoughtful and purposeful use of AI and technology, and continued attention to student well-being so every student feels challenged, supported, and seen.
The May separation agreement with Superintendent Jason Glass and the subsequent appointment of Don Austin generated significant public debate. How did you vote—or how would you have voted—and what lessons should the Board take from that transition?
Based on the information made publicly available, I would not have supported the separation agreement with Dr. Glass or the process used to appoint his successor.
A superintendent transition is one of the most consequential decisions a school board makes. It should be handled deliberately, transparently, and with appropriate community input.
Dr. Austin is now LBUSD’s superintendent, and I want him and the district to succeed. The lesson going forward is that sound process matters. Major decisions should strengthen public confidence rather than leave the community questioning how or why they were made.
Do you support the proposed $83 million school-facilities bond? What projects, taxpayer safeguards and independent oversight should accompany any bond spending?
Yes. I support Measure A and believe maintaining high-quality school facilities is an important long-term investment in our students and community.
Bond expenditures should remain tied to the projects and purposes presented to voters, with priorities guided by the district’s Facilities Master Plan. I support strong taxpayer safeguards, including independent audits, a citizens’ oversight committee, transparent public reporting, competitive procurement, and careful monitoring of project budgets and timelines.
LBUSD is highly rated overall, but where do you believe the district is not adequately serving students? What specific improvement would you pursue in areas such as academics, literacy, special education, mental health, bullying or technology?
We have an exceptional district, talented educators, strong programs, and students who consistently achieve at high levels. My focus is on building on that strong foundation and continually asking where we can do even better.
One opportunity is to look more closely at whether every student is appropriately challenged and growing, including students who are doing well but may have greater potential. I would support using student-growth data alongside teacher expertise to identify opportunities for greater challenge, engagement, and support.
In a high-performing district, continuous improvement should be the standard. Doing well should give us the foundation, and the ambition, to keep getting better. I also want continued attention to student mental health and belonging. Academic success and student well-being are connected; every student should feel appropriately challenged, supported, and seen.
How should the Board balance its oversight responsibilities with the superintendent’s authority to operate the district? What would you do to improve transparency, public trust and productive working relationships?
The Board should govern; the superintendent should manage.
The Board’s role is to establish priorities and policy, oversee finances and district performance, hire and evaluate the superintendent, and remain accountable to the public. It should not micromanage day-to-day operations or substitute individual trustees’ judgment for professional expertise.
I would work toward more predictable and accessible Board meetings, timely agendas and supporting materials, clear public communication, and collaborative relationships with district leadership and employees. Good governance should generally be steady and uneventful, allowing educators and administrators to focus on students rather than Board politics.
How will you maintain independent judgment while also working collaboratively with other Board members, employee groups, parents and community organizations?
Collaboration and independence are not opposites. Good decisions come from listening to different perspectives, asking difficult questions, examining the evidence, and then exercising independent judgment.
As an attorney, I advise clients every day in situations where thoughtful people may disagree. You can disagree respectfully without making the disagreement personal.
I will listen to fellow Board members, educators, staff, parents, students, and community members, but no individual or organization will determine my vote. My responsibility as a trustee will be to make the decision I believe best serves LBUSD students and the district as a whole.
May 2026 Glass separation
Vote or candidate status
No Board vote. Sheik-Sadhal was not a trustee when the May 12 separation agreement was approved. In her candidate-submitted response, she says she would not have supported the separation agreement with Dr. Glass or the process used to appoint his successor, citing the need for deliberate, transparent decision-making and appropriate community input.
Campaign finance
Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal campaign disclosures
LBUSD candidates file through Orange County. Candidates who raise or spend at least $2,000 use Form 460; candidates remaining below that threshold may use Form 470. The first pre-election deadline is September 24, followed by the second committee report on October 22. Certain contributions of $1,000 or more are reportable within 24 hours during the election period.
Candidate-listed committee ID: 1491736
Search official Orange County campaign-finance records · Official FPPC schedule
Public voting record
Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal voting record
Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal is not currently a member of the body they are seeking to join, so they have no incumbent voting record for this race. This is not a judgment about other public or appointed roles.
Sources
Records used for this profile
- Orange County Registrar candidate log and official ballot order
- So Laguna: vote details and competing community perspectives
- Daily Pilot: contemporaneous report on the 3–2 separation vote
- LBUSD Board member roster
- Candidate campaign website
- Voice of Laguna candidate interview · August 12, 2026
- Mark Orgill endorsement published by the candidate campaign
- Candidate-submitted So Laguna questionnaire received August 28, 2026
Quick answers
Frequently asked questions
Is Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal running for Laguna Beach School Board in 2026?
Yes. Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal appears in ballot position 2 of five candidates for three at-large LBUSD Board seats.
Is Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal an incumbent?
Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal is not currently an LBUSD Board member.
How did Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal vote on the May 2026 Glass separation?
No Board vote. Sheik-Sadhal was not a trustee when the May 12 separation agreement was approved. In her candidate-submitted response, she says she would not have supported the separation agreement with Dr. Glass or the process used to appoint his successor, citing the need for deliberate, transparent decision-making and appropriate community input.
How does So Laguna verify this profile?
So Laguna separates official records, candidate-controlled statements and independent reporting. Unknown positions are labeled rather than inferred, and source links are provided for readers to check.