Laguna Beach election 2026 · Official ballot position 5 of 5 · Nonpartisan candidate profile
Joan Malczewski: Laguna Beach School Board Candidate 2026
Current LBUSD Board member; first elected in 2022
Ballot designation: Professor/Parent. Candidate for one of three at-large LBUSD Board seats in the November 3 election.
Last reviewed September 29, 2026. Official order and designation follow the Orange County Registrar of Voters candidate list.
Candidate dashboard
Joan Malczewski at a glance
Public appearances
2026 candidate forums and debates
This School Board schedule includes KXFM’s completed joint forum and the PTA Council’s October 7 school-board-only forum. The PTA Council says all five School Board candidates were invited; a listing does not confirm attendance.
All currently listed forums have concluded. Past forum records remain available below.
Past forums2 completed
Laguna Beach Unified Council of PTAs
6:00–7:30 p.m. · Thurston Middle School Library
2100 Park Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordView official flyerWatch recording and compare answersSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsLaguna Beach PTA Council information
KXFM
5:30 p.m. potluck; 6:30 p.m. forum · Neighborhood Congregational Church, Bridge Hall
340 St Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Compare KXFM candidate answersKXFM forum page
KXFM has published a 10-question candidate-results summary and an official Facebook reel from the September 8 forum. So Laguna has not verified a complete audio or video replay of the full program.
Open the So Laguna events calendarLaguna Beach PTA Council information
PTA School Board forum · October 7, 2026
What Joan Malczewski said at the forum
Source-linked paraphrases from the published recording. Candidate claims are attributed; automatic captions may contain errors.
Read 11 forum answers
- 1. Community representationWould keep decisions student-focused with parents, teachers and staff involved. Emphasizes schooling as a public asset with community and fiduciary responsibilities.
- 2. Student voice and graduation decisionsSupports student representatives and student input. Says the Board could discuss the issue, but it should not have been an action item on a short timeline after graduation plans were made.
- 3. Special education and inclusionNotes legal limits on Board involvement and access to individual student information. Wants better communication and partnerships with families after listening to their concerns.
- 4. Classroom technology and AIGenerally opposes elementary screens and would limit middle-school use while meeting state requirements. Wants learning goals to determine when technology supports teachers rather than replaces them.
- 5. Evidence for technology policyWants adaptable policies and current educational research, citing handwriting, memory and concerns about automatic spelling tools in elementary learning.
- 6. District strengths and improvementsWants a stronger culture of reading and writing alongside innovation and attention to learning. Says teacher trust must be rebuilt and questions Bates’s characterization of the mathematics data.
- 7. Measure A and facilitiesStrongly supports Measure A as a candidate and parent. Points to the age of the buildings and argues that delaying repairs increases costs, while distinguishing facilities needs from an immediate emergency.
- 8. PTA, SchoolPower and community organizationsDescribes membership in all four PTAs, PTA Council representation, SchoolPower support and Boys & Girls Club and sports involvement. Values grants and after-school programs.
- 9. Teacher and staff trustWould ask teachers and unions how to rebuild trust after no-confidence votes, demonstrate respect for expertise and put student needs at the center of collaborative work.
- 10. Student well-being and school safetySupports continued student surveys and access to trusted adults, and would extend partnerships to special-education families while reviewing district well-being reports.
- 11. Personal accomplishmentsIs proud of the five children she and her husband raised, their commitment to giving back and the close family relationships they maintain.
Compare candidates, review the questions and search the transcript →
Who they are
Background and experience
Tenured UC Irvine history professor and former CPA with three decades in education, leadership and public service. Her campaign lists prior faculty or administrative roles at NYU and Columbia, a PhD and MA from Columbia, and a BA in economics and accounting from the University of Michigan.
Voter case
Why voters may consider Joan Malczewski
- Academic expertise in education history and policy
- Former CPA and financial-analysis background
- Incumbent experience and stated focus on collaboration with educators
- Campaign-stated experience mentoring future educators with New York City public-school teachers
This is a neutral summary of potentially favorable qualifications, not an endorsement.
Due diligence
Questions voters may want answered
- What concrete measures would show improved trust and collaboration with educators and families?
- How should the district measure and report expanded opportunities for sustained reading and writing?
- What evidence-based criteria and limits should govern classroom AI, screen time and instructional technology?
Candidate priorities
What Joan Malczewski emphasizes
- Trust and collaboration with teachers, staff and families
- A stronger culture of sustained reading and writing
- Evidence-based instructional technology and artificial-intelligence practices
- Academic achievement, student health and wellness
- Special education and transparent approaches to bullying and discipline
Summarized from candidate-controlled materials and the supplied campaign announcement; wording is condensed and attributed, not independently validated policy analysis.
Direct candidate response
Joan Malczewski answers So Laguna’s School Board questionnaire
Received August 27, 2026. The candidate supplied the answers below in response to the same questionnaire sent to all five School Board candidates. The responses are published in full, with only formatting and typographic normalization; they are candidate statements, not an endorsement or independent verification by So Laguna.
Why are you running for the LBUSD Board, and what experience or perspective would you bring to the position?
I am running for re-election because I care deeply about public education, our students, and our community. As an LBUSD parent, I have a personal stake in the continued excellence of our schools. I bring thirty years of experience in education as a professor, researcher, teacher educator, and administrator, as well as financial experience as a former CPA and the practical experience of serving on the LBUSD Board. I understand what makes excellent schools work, the responsibility of governing them well, and the importance of building the trust and collaboration that strong schools require.
What are your three highest priorities for LBUSD, and what measurable progress should voters expect during your term?
My three priorities are rebuilding trust and collaboration with teachers, staff, and families; strengthening a culture of reading; and ensuring thoughtful use of instructional technology.
I will work to strengthen those relationships and support transparent, collaborative decision-making. I will continue advocating for a culture of reading and deep learning. Our students are highly literate, but sustained opportunities for reading and writing in the curriculum will help students to develop skills that support achievement across disciplines and prepare them to engage thoughtfully in their communities.
Finally, I want LBUSD to lead in the thoughtful use of technology and artificial intelligence. Decisions about technology should begin with what we want students to learn and proceed to discussions about how technology can enhance rather than replace methods for teaching.
Progress should be reflected in stronger relationships with our educators and community, continued strong academic performance, increased opportunities for sustained reading and writing, and clear, evidence-based practices for instructional technology.
The May separation agreement with Superintendent Jason Glass and the subsequent appointment of Don Austin generated significant public debate. How did you vote—or how would you have voted—and what lessons should the Board take from that transition?
I voted no on the motion to enter into a separation agreement with Dr. Jason Glass and on the subsequent motion to appoint Dr. Don Austin.
I voted against the separation agreement with Dr. Jason Glass and against the subsequent appointment of Dr. Don Austin. Dr. Glass had been appointed unanimously just ten months earlier, and I did not believe there was a reason to enter into a separation agreement.
My vote regarding Dr. Austin reflected concerns about the process, not his qualifications. I was presented with a motion in closed session to appoint him but had no awareness that the board majority was in conversation with him. It is important that superintendent searches and appointments follow from a transparent, inclusive process that provides appropriate opportunities for Board and community input. That process is important for both building public trust and giving a new superintendent the strongest possible foundation for success.
Dr. Austin is an experienced and knowledgeable educator, and I am committed to supporting him and working collaboratively to ensure his success in LBUSD. Our students and staff deserve a stable, effective district leadership team.
Do you support the proposed $83 million school-facilities bond? What projects, taxpayer safeguards and independent oversight should accompany any bond spending?
If voters approve Measure A, the district will be able to upgrade and modernize school facilities to support current and future instructional needs. Projects identified through the Facilities Master Plan include improvements to health and safety, accessibility for students with disabilities, wildfire protection, and facilities that support high-quality teaching and learning. Bond projects that harden buildings with fire-resistant materials are of particular interest with all Laguna schools in a very high wildfire zone.
Bond funds should be spent only on voter-approved purposes and subject to strong fiscal controls, regular public reporting, independent audits, and oversight by the required citizens’ independent oversight committee. Projects should be prioritized through the Facilities Master Plan, with the district remaining accountable to taxpayers throughout the life of the bond. I appreciate the taxpayer safeguards included: bond funds can only be used for facilities, must remain in local Laguna Beach schools, and cannot be taken by the state or used for salaries or pensions.
I personally support Measure A for two reasons. The last bond measure from 2001 is about to expire, so the proposed measure will simply extend—but not raise—my existing tax rate. I support it because I want every Laguna Beach student to attend a safe, modern school.
LBUSD is highly rated overall, but where do you believe the district is not adequately serving students? What specific improvement would you pursue in areas such as academics, literacy, special education, mental health, bullying or technology?
Laguna Beach has an excellent school district and a strong foundation for future success. Maintaining that excellence requires continuous improvement and attention to the changing needs of students. I remain focused on academic excellence for every student, student health and wellness, clear and transparent approaches to discipline and bullying, and thoughtful policies for instructional technology.
Two areas where I would like to see continued progress are reading and instructional technology. I have advocated for a stronger culture of sustained reading and writing because those skills support learning across disciplines. I also believe technology, including artificial intelligence, should be used when it advances clearly defined learning objectives, with appropriate attention to screen time and student well-being.
I will continue to support strong mental health and wellness programs, effective special education services, and fair, transparent approaches to bullying and student discipline. In an excellent district, the goal should not be to wait for something to fail, but to continually evaluate what we are doing and look for opportunities to improve.
How should the Board balance its oversight responsibilities with the superintendent’s authority to operate the district? What would you do to improve transparency, public trust and productive working relationships?
The Board is responsible for setting policy, establishing priorities, providing fiscal and educational oversight, and holding the superintendent accountable for the district’s performance. The superintendent and professional staff should have the authority to manage the day-to-day operations of the district and implement those policies.
Productive governance requires trust, collaboration, transparency, and respect for professional expertise. I will support open decision-making, compliance with governance and transparency requirements, clear communication with the community, and a collaborative working relationship among the Board, superintendent, teachers, staff, and families. Strong governance creates the conditions that allow educators to focus on what matters most: student success.
How will you maintain independent judgment while also working collaboratively with other Board members, employee groups, parents and community organizations?
Good governance requires both independent judgment and collaboration. I approach decisions by listening carefully, asking questions, considering evidence, and respecting the expertise and perspectives of others. Collaboration does not require agreement, but it does require respectful discussion, transparency, and a willingness to work toward shared goals.
My decisions will remain grounded in what I believe best serves students and the educational mission of the district. I will work constructively with fellow Board members, educators, parents, and community organizations to build trust, find common ground, and support the continued excellence of our schools.
May 2026 Glass separation
Vote or candidate status
Voted no. Malczewski joined Jim Kelly in opposing the May 12 separation agreement with Superintendent Jason Glass; the motion passed 3–2.
Campaign finance
Joan Malczewski campaign disclosures
LBUSD candidates file through Orange County. Candidates who raise or spend at least $2,000 use Form 460; candidates remaining below that threshold may use Form 470. The first pre-election deadline is September 24, followed by the second committee report on October 22. Certain contributions of $1,000 or more are reportable within 24 hours during the election period.
Candidate-listed committee ID: 1491910
Search official Orange County campaign-finance records · Official FPPC schedule
Public voting record
Joan Malczewski recorded Board votes
Current Board composition: December 16, 2024–August 27, 2026. December 16, 2024 is the objective breakpoint because Sheri Morgan and Howard Hills took office at that meeting. This period is calculated separately from the prior composition below. It includes substantive decisions, consent-calendar items and other recorded motions from 50 meetings. Routine adjournment, recess, convening, return-to-open-session and call-to-order motions are excluded uniformly. “With prevailing side” means the member’s recorded yes or no position matched the motion’s recorded outcome; it is descriptive, not a score of ideology, independence, effectiveness or agreement with another trustee.
Verification notice: These source-linked records have not all been individually checked by So Laguna. Confirm details through the linked official government meeting record. For closed sessions, only publicly reported actions and attributable votes are included; confidential discussion is not reconstructed.
August 27, 2026
View meeting record →Browse full voting record 297 more positions
July 9, 2026
View meeting record →June 8, 2026
View meeting record →June 4, 2026
View meeting record →June 3, 2026
View meeting record →May 14, 2026
View meeting record →May 14, 2026
View meeting record →May 12, 2026
View meeting record →April 23, 2026
View meeting record →April 16, 2026
View meeting record →April 9, 2026
View meeting record →March 26, 2026
View meeting record →March 12, 2026
View meeting record →February 26, 2026
View meeting record →February 12, 2026
View meeting record →January 22, 2026
View meeting record →January 8, 2026
View meeting record →December 16, 2025
View meeting record →December 11, 2025
View meeting record →November 13, 2025
View meeting record →October 23, 2025
View meeting record →October 9, 2025
View meeting record →October 1, 2025
View meeting record →September 29, 2025
View meeting record →September 25, 2025
View meeting record →September 18, 2025
View meeting record →September 11, 2025
View meeting record →August 28, 2025
View meeting record →August 14, 2025
View meeting record →July 24, 2025
View meeting record →June 9, 2025
View meeting record →June 5, 2025
View meeting record →May 22, 2025
View meeting record →May 10, 2025
View meeting record →May 8, 2025
View meeting record →May 7, 2025
View meeting record →April 24, 2025
View meeting record →April 17, 2025
View meeting record →March 20, 2025
View meeting record →March 13, 2025
View meeting record →March 6, 2025
View meeting record →March 5, 2025
View meeting record →February 24, 2025
View meeting record →February 13, 2025
View meeting record →February 12, 2025
View meeting record →January 27, 2025
View meeting record →January 23, 2025
View meeting record →January 16, 2025
View meeting record →January 9, 2025
View meeting record →December 16, 2024
View meeting record →Prior Board composition: January 12, 2023–November 21, 2024
266 recorded positions across 45 meetings. 100.0% of yes/no positions with a recorded outcome were with the prevailing side. The same date window, source rules and procedural exclusions apply to both incumbents. The records are separated at the change in Board membership rather than at an arbitrary one- or two-year cutoff.
Browse the 2023–2024 source-linked record
November 21, 2024
View meeting record →November 8, 2024
View meeting record →October 10, 2024
View meeting record →September 26, 2024
View meeting record →September 12, 2024
View meeting record →August 15, 2024
View meeting record →August 7, 2024
View meeting record →July 25, 2024
View meeting record →July 17, 2024
View meeting record →June 21, 2024
View meeting record →June 10, 2024
View meeting record →June 6, 2024
View meeting record →May 23, 2024
View meeting record →May 9, 2024
View meeting record →April 18, 2024
View meeting record →March 28, 2024
View meeting record →March 14, 2024
View meeting record →February 15, 2024
View meeting record →February 13, 2024
View meeting record →February 1, 2024
View meeting record →January 23, 2024
View meeting record →January 11, 2024
View meeting record →December 14, 2023
View meeting record →November 16, 2023
View meeting record →October 26, 2023
View meeting record →October 12, 2023
View meeting record →September 28, 2023
View meeting record →September 21, 2023
View meeting record →August 17, 2023
View meeting record →August 9, 2023
View meeting record →July 27, 2023
View meeting record →July 12, 2023
View meeting record →June 27, 2023
View meeting record →June 26, 2023
View meeting record →June 15, 2023
View meeting record →June 1, 2023
View meeting record →May 25, 2023
View meeting record →May 23, 2023
View meeting record →May 11, 2023
View meeting record →April 20, 2023
View meeting record →March 23, 2023
View meeting record →March 9, 2023
View meeting record →February 16, 2023
View meeting record →February 2, 2023
View meeting record →January 12, 2023
View meeting record →Sources
Records used for this profile
- Orange County Registrar candidate log and official ballot order
- So Laguna: vote details and competing community perspectives
- Daily Pilot: contemporaneous report on the 3–2 separation vote
- LBUSD Board member roster
- LBUSD Board member profile
- Candidate campaign website
- Candidate-submitted So Laguna questionnaire received August 27, 2026
Quick answers
Frequently asked questions
Is Joan Malczewski running for Laguna Beach School Board in 2026?
Yes. Joan Malczewski appears in ballot position 5 of five candidates for three at-large LBUSD Board seats.
Is Joan Malczewski an incumbent?
Joan Malczewski is a current LBUSD Board member.
How did Joan Malczewski vote on the May 2026 Glass separation?
Voted no. Malczewski joined Jim Kelly in opposing the May 12 separation agreement with Superintendent Jason Glass; the motion passed 3–2.
How does So Laguna verify this profile?
So Laguna separates official records, candidate-controlled statements and independent reporting. Unknown positions are labeled rather than inferred, and source links are provided for readers to check.