Nonpartisan local voter guide • Last updated
Laguna Beach Election Guide: 2026 Candidates & Voting Information
Use So Laguna’s nonpartisan Laguna Beach election guide for the November 3, 2026 election. Voters will elect three City Council members and three LBUSD Board members. Compare candidates, Measure E, forums, campaign finance, voting deadlines and official results with direct links to primary records.
New recording coverage: The October 15 Chamber debate now has video, 16 discussion topics, 80 indexed responses, candidate statements and searchable automatic captions. Related Council quiz evidence has been updated. Watch the Chamber forum.
Latest completed forum: Laguna Beach Chamber of Commerce · October 15, 2026. Watch the recording, compare answers and search transcripts.
Quick answer
What is on Laguna Beach’s 2026 local ballot?
“At large” means every registered voter in Laguna Beach can vote in the Council race; candidates do not run from geographic districts. Councilmembers serve four-year staggered terms and exercise the city’s legislative authority, including adopting ordinances, setting policy, approving budgets and making major land-use and public-project decisions.
Candidate tracker
Who is running for Laguna Beach City Council in 2026?
Each City Council candidate is covered using the same standards. Unknown positions are labeled rather than inferred.
Sue Kempf
Currently serves on the Laguna Beach City Council and is seeking another term.
Endorsed by Laguna Beach Firefighters Association Endorsed by Laguna Beach Police Employees’ Association
Ashley Cintas
Does not currently hold a Laguna Beach City Council seat.
Laura Parisi
Does not currently hold a City Council seat; currently serves as Laguna Beach’s elected City Treasurer.
Mark Orgill
Current City Councilmember and Laguna Beach mayor; seeking another Council term.
Endorsed by Laguna Beach Firefighters Association Endorsed by Laguna Beach Police Employees’ Association
Nick Aronoff
Does not currently hold a Laguna Beach City Council seat.
Edward Bayuk
Does not currently hold a Laguna Beach City Council seat.
Joy Berry
Does not currently hold a Laguna Beach City Council seat.
Alex Rounaghi
Currently serves on the Laguna Beach City Council and is seeking another term.
Endorsed by Laguna Beach Firefighters Association Endorsed by Laguna Beach Police Employees’ AssociationKaren Martin
Does not currently hold a Laguna Beach City Council seat.
Cards follow the official ballot order published by the City Clerk on August 13, 2026. Select a profile for sourced background, issue positions, campaign finance, official statements and public questions.
Public appearances
2026 candidate forums and debates
The City currently lists nine forums hosted by independent community organizations. The hosts have affirmed that candidates were offered equal time and opportunity to appear. A listing does not establish that every candidate has confirmed attendance.
All currently listed forums have concluded. Past forum records remain available below.
Past forums9 completed
Laguna Beach Chamber of Commerce
6:00–9:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordView official flyerWatch video, answers and transcriptSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsOfficial Chamber forum details
South Laguna Civic Association
6:00 p.m. (doors open 5:30 p.m.) · Laguna Beach Community Recreation Center (former St. Catherine’s School)
30516 South Coast Highway, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordWatch recording and compare answersSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsOfficial SLCA event details
Laguna Canyon Conservancy
5:30–8:30 p.m. (panel 6:30–8:30 p.m.) · Bridge Hall at Neighborhood Congregational Church
340 St Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordWatch videos, answers and transcriptsSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsOfficial event details
Laguna Beach Arts Alliance
9:00 a.m.–noon (reception 8:30 a.m.) · Forum Theater at Festival of Arts
650 Laguna Canyon Road, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordOpen forum replaySearch transcriptCandidate timestampsArts Alliance information
Greater Laguna Beach GOP
6:00–9:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordOpen forum replaySearch transcriptCandidate timestampsGLBGOP event and viewing information
Advocates for Laguna Residents
6:00–8:00 p.m. · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordWatch video, answers and transcriptSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsAdvocates for Laguna Residents website (currently Launching Soon)
Canyon Alliance of Neighborhoods Defense Organization (CANDO)
6:30 p.m. · Online via Zoom
Completed September 10. Watch the full recording, compare all seven answers from each candidate and search the complete transcript.Forum recordFull forum videoSearch transcriptCandidate timestampsCANDO forum page
KXFM
5:30 p.m. potluck; 6:30 p.m. forum · Neighborhood Congregational Church, Bridge Hall
340 St Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Compare KXFM candidate answersKXFM forum page
KXFM has published a 10-question candidate-results summary and an official Facebook reel from the September 8 forum. So Laguna has not verified a complete audio or video replay of the full program.
Village Laguna
6:00 p.m.; recording 1:57:49 · Council Chambers
505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Forum recordOpen forum replaySearch transcriptCandidate timestampsVillage Laguna forum information
Open the So Laguna events calendarVerify the City’s current schedule
Same facts for every City Council candidate
2026 City Council candidate comparison
This live table uses identical financial fields for every City Council candidate. Figures appear only after So Laguna reviews the underlying City filing; each reporting period links to its official record.
October 19 Kempf filings: The new Form 460 covers September 20–October 17: $5,850 received, $11,509.70 spent and $28,042.29 ending cash. Calendar-year contributions are $44,602; no loans or debt are reported. The comparison uses reported calendar-year totals, while unitemized contributions ($50) cover this period only. Spending discrepancy: the filing reports $15,626.05 year to date, while the amended earlier-period $5,050.01 plus this period’s $11,509.70 equals $16,559.71 — a $933.66 difference. The reported figure is displayed without an inferred correction. Cash reconciles to the two period totals. Read new Form 460, summary p. 3. The separate 24-page amendment replaces July 1–September 19 filing 1112 for typographical and contributor-detail corrections; its summary totals are unchanged and are not added again.
October 16 finance update: Six Forms 496 filed October 15 disclose $10,859.21 in independent support for Sue Kempf, Alex Rounaghi and Mark Orgill: $5,972.56 from the Laguna Beach Firefighters Association PAC and $4,886.65 from the Laguna Beach Police Employees Association PAC. The ads and mailers were paid October 8 and 14. These amounts are included in the outside-spending column below, separately from candidate campaign receipts. Each filing’s repeated cumulative figure is counted once.
| Ballot | Candidate | Incumbent | Total contributions | Spent | Cash on hand | Debt | Reporting period | Independent spending / committee funding | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sue Kempf | Yes | $44,602.00 | $15,626.05 | $28,042.29 | $0.00 | Oct. 17, 2026 filing | $100,000 shared committee contribution Supports Kempf, Rounaghi and Orgill together; not allocated per candidate. |
Sue Kempf profile |
| 2 | Ashley Cintas | No | $26,763.00 | $8,855.61 | $20,998.29 | $17,090.90 | Sep. 19, 2026 filing | No reviewed Form 496 | Ashley Cintas profile |
| 3 | Laura Parisi | No — City Treasurer | Periodic totals pending | Form 501 · Aug. 7, 2026 | No reviewed Form 496 | Laura Parisi profile | |||
| 4 | Mark Orgill | Yes | $28,935.61 | $8,834.14 | $22,059.19 | $1,957.72 | Sep. 19, 2026 filing | $100,000 shared committee contribution Supports Kempf, Rounaghi and Orgill together; not allocated per candidate. |
Mark Orgill profile |
| 5 | Nick Aronoff | No | $10,575.00 | $4,852.47 | $6,908.03 | $2,185.50 | Sep. 19, 2026 filing | No reviewed Form 496 | Nick Aronoff profile |
| 6 | Edward Bayuk | No | Periodic totals pending | Form 410 · Sep. 11, 2026 | No reviewed Form 496 | Edward Bayuk profile | |||
| 7 | Joy Berry | No | $11,689.00 | $1,043.02 | $10,645.98 | $0.00 | Sep. 17, 2026 filing Form 497 · 2026-10-05 · $3,000.00 candidate loan |
No reviewed Form 496 | Joy Berry profile |
| 8 | Alex Rounaghi | Yes | $65,742.18 | $25,728.18 | $36,404.35 | $0.00 | Sep. 19, 2026 filing | $100,000 shared committee contribution Supports Kempf, Rounaghi and Orgill together; not allocated per candidate. |
Alex Rounaghi profile |
| 9 | Karen Martin | No | $1,599.00 | $1,169.37 | $429.63 | $0.00 | Sep. 19, 2026 filing | No reviewed Form 496 | Karen Martin profile |
Funding behind the new independent spending: Laguna Beach Good Leadership Committee Supporting Kempf, Rounaghi and Orgill for City Council 2026, Sponsored by Regency Properties LP and Affiliated Entities (FPPC ID 1497439), reported receiving $100,000 from Regency Properties, L.P. on September 30. Its October 1 Form 497, Regency’s contributor-side October 1 Form 497 and page 2 of its October 3 Orgill Form 496 disclose the same contribution; it is counted once. The three October 3 Forms 496 report $61,465.39 in October 2 independent spending. Three October 14 Forms 496 add $38,484.61 spent October 13 on mailers, robocalls and text messages. The committee’s three reported cumulative amounts sum to $99,950: $33,316.68 supporting Kempf, $33,316.67 supporting Rounaghi and $33,316.65 supporting Orgill. Each cumulative figure includes the earlier spending and is not an additional transaction. The October 15 firefighters’ and police employees’ PAC reports add $10,859.21 across the same three candidates. Including these reports and Rounaghi’s separate $2,710 Ahmanson / Fieldstead slate mailer, all reviewed outside support totals $36,936.42 for Kempf, $39,646.40 for Rounaghi and $36,936.39 for Orgill. Correction October 16: the earlier summary incorrectly described the Good Leadership Committee’s spending as $100,000; its six reviewed reports total $99,950. The separate $100,000 contribution remains unchanged. This funding went to the outside committee, not to the candidates’ campaign accounts. These accelerated reports do not establish the committee’s current cash balance. Read the committee’s October 1 Form 497 and Regency’s matching Form 497.
Received $3,000 from Joy Berry; the contributor entry says LOAN, although the loan checkbox is blank and no interest rate is reported. Shown separately from Form 460 period totals. This accelerated report does not establish current cash, spending or outstanding debt.
Firefighters PAC: Its September 23 Form 460 reports $500 direct monetary contributions each to Sue Kempf, Mark Orgill and Alex Rounaghi. These are contributions to candidate committees, not independent expenditures. Read Schedule D, pages 13–14.
Total contributions follows FPPC Form 460 Line 5 and can include loans or candidate self-funding. When only Form 497 reports are available, the displayed amount is the sum of reviewed accelerated transactions—not a complete campaign total. Independent spending reported on Form 496 is shown in its own column and is not added to candidate-controlled fundraising or spending. Figures reflect each candidate’s latest reviewed filing and may cover different reporting periods. Open the source filing before comparing totals.
Public record
Incumbent City Council candidate voting records
This comparison uses the same source-linked rows as each candidate profile. Each row links to the official meeting record; voice votes without an individually recorded position are labeled rather than inferred.
| Date and decision | Sue Kempf | Mark Orgill | Alex Rounaghi | Official record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Adoption of ordinance extending the Design Review Efficiency Ordinance and required 10-day report, finding project exempt from CEQA. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Adoption of ordinance extending the urgency Design Review Efficiency Ordinance and adoption of required 10-day report, finding actions exempt from CEQA. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Adoption of resolution establishing objective design standards for single and two-family residential development and finding the action categorically exempt from CEQA, with addition to include Laguna Canyon Area annexation area specific plan on the map. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Appointment of Alex Rounaghi as alternate to South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SACWA) board, retaining Michelle Banigan as alternate. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Approval of consent calendar items excluding items 10, 16, 17, 18, and 19. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Authorization to enter into a 12-month pilot contract with Crossbeam AI for plan checking and permitting process improvements. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Environmental Sustainability Committee recommendation on renewable energy and CCA policy. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Motion to deny the appeal and direct staff to prepare a revised resolution with four more restrictive conditions of approval and revised public view protection section, with resolution to be returned for adoption on September 22nd. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Motion to postpone hearing on appeal to September 22nd. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Motion to postpone the hearing on appeal of Design Review Board decision for 315552 Eagle Rockway to September 22nd. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Recognition of Matt Lawson as Emergency Operations Center (EOC) namesake honoree and adoption of resolution with direction to add previously approved recitals. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Support for herbicide-free pilot program in Aliso Creek channel with direction to explore Laguna Canyon Creek addition. | YES | YES | YES | Meeting Official City meeting record |
Verification notice: Source-linked records have not all been manually reviewed by So Laguna. Confirm details through the linked official record. “Not recorded” is not an abstention, absence or inferred position.
Council composition
Which City Council seats are up in 2026?
| Current member | First elected | Current term expires | 2026 status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Orgill, Mayor | 2022 | 2026 | Qualified candidate |
| Alex Rounaghi, Councilmember | 2022 | 2026 | Qualified candidate |
| Sue Kempf, Councilmember | 2018 | 2026 | Qualified candidate |
| Hallie Jones, Mayor Pro Tem | 2024 | 2028 | Not regularly scheduled for election in 2026 |
| Bob Whalen, Councilmember | 2012 | 2028 | Not regularly scheduled for election in 2026 |
Titles and terms reflect the City of Laguna Beach’s published City Council roster reviewed August 14, 2026.
Issue-based coverage
Issues So Laguna will ask every City Council candidate about
Public safety and hospital access
The future of emergency and acute-care services at Mission Hospital Laguna Beach, ambulance transport times and emergency-response coverage.
Housing and land use
State housing mandates, development review, neighborhood character, historic resources and resident participation.
Traffic, parking and transit
PCH parking policy, neighborhood spillover, trolley and microtransit service, pedestrian safety and summer congestion.
City spending and capital projects
Budget priorities, project oversight, cost escalation, public contracts and transparent reporting on major civic projects.
Beaches, climate and wildfire
Coastal access, marine protections, water quality, fuel modification, evacuation routes and climate resilience.
Arts, businesses and village character
Support for artists and independent businesses, public art, downtown activity, festivals and the character of Laguna Beach.
Local ballot measure
Ballot Measure E: Laguna Beach City Council term limits
What a “Yes” vote means
A Yes vote favors adopting the proposed City Council term-limit rules.
What a “No” vote means
A No vote favors keeping the current system, under which Laguna Beach voters may continue reelecting a Councilmember without a local term limit.
This is a neutral summary of the measure’s legal effect, not an endorsement. Arguments and rebuttals are advocacy documents written by their signers; they are linked below so voters can read each side in full.
Campaign finance
Who is funding and spending for and against Measure E?
So Laguna reviews both sides using the same City filing system and links directly to the original FPPC records. The latest Form 460 gives a reporting-period summary. Earlier Forms 496 and 497 identify specific transactions that may also appear in a later Form 460; these figures must not be added together.
NimbleGov PAC
$3,068 contributions received · July 1–September 19, 2026
- Spent this period
- $1,113.51
- Cash balance Sept. 19
- $9,100.41
- FPPC ID
- 1421491
The September 25 amended Form 460 corrects a donor’s address; the reported financial totals match the September 24 original. Its payment schedule lists brochures and reimbursements for business cards and yard signs. NimbleGov filed as a general-purpose committee, so these committee-wide figures should not be described as spending exclusively on Measure E.
View amended Form 460 · 7 pages
$2,842.18 first mailing payment supporting Measure E
Form 496 report 10-001, filed October 3, 2026, reports an October 3 half-payment for an EDDM mailing through USP Group. A second Form 496, report 10-002 filed October 5, reports the $2,842.19 half and final payment on October 5 for the same mailing. The two payments total $5,684.37. Both fall after the September 19 closing date above; they do not replace the period totals or provide an updated cash balance.
View October 3 Form 496 · View October 5 final-payment Form 496
Citizens for Laguna’s Future
Committee organization amendment: The amended Form 410 identifies Barbara Bowler as treasurer and Joy Dittberner as principal officer of committee 1450234, opposing Measure E. The Secretary of State stamp is August 17; the City received it October 12, 2026. This form reports no new receipts, spending, cash or debt. Read amended Form 410 · 2 pages.
$2,000 new independent expenditure opposing Measure E
- Purpose reported
- Media production / video editing
- Expenditure / filing date
- October 13, 2026
- Report number
- 4
- FPPC ID
- 1450234
This Form 496 reports a separate payment from the October 8 consultant expenditure below. The two later reports total $4,500 after the September 19 Form 460 closing date. They do not replace that statement’s period totals. No vendor or current cash balance is reported.
$2,500 October 8 independent expenditure opposing Measure E
- Purpose reported
- Campaign consultant
- Expenditure / filing date
- October 8, 2026
- Report number
- 3
- FPPC ID
- 1450234
This Form 496 reports a new October 8 payment after the September 19 Form 460 closing date below. It is shown separately from those period totals and the earlier August 27 expenditure. The consultant is not named in this report; it does not establish a current cash balance.
$11,905.74 contributions received · July 1–September 19, 2026
- Spent this period
- $11,016.07
- Spent in 2026 through Sept. 19
- $15,083.34
- Cash balance Sept. 19
- $11,478.48
- FPPC ID
- 1450234
The new Form 460 names Barbara Bowler as treasurer. Its payment schedules list three $2,500 consulting payments to Four Lions Media, along with printing, campaign literature and web expenses. The contributors include a $500 contribution from the Laguna Beach Democratic Club on September 14.
$2,500 independent expenditure
- Purpose reported
- Consultant
- Filed
- August 27, 2026
- FPPC ID
- 1450234
The earlier Form 496 identifies a specific transaction, not an additional $2,500 to add to the later Form 460 expenditure total. Its consultant was not named on that accelerated report.
$1,000 contribution received
- Contributor
- Patrick Quilter
- Date received
- September 9, 2026
- Occupation
- Engineer
- Employer
- Quilter Labs
The earlier Form 497 reports this individual contribution, which also appears in the Form 460 Schedule A. It is included in the $11,905.74 period total above, not added to it. So Laguna omits the contributor’s street address.
$1,000 new accelerated contribution
- Contributor
- Steve Chadima
- Date received
- September 25, 2026
- Occupation
- Retired
Form 497 report no. 2 lists this contribution after the September 19 closing date of the Form 460 above. It is a subsequent transaction, not part of the $11,905.74 reporting-period total; a future Form 460 may include it.
Last reviewed October 16, 2026. Search the City filing system. Contributions and expenditures are reported separately and are not treated as endorsements by So Laguna.
California ballot
2026 statewide propositions—and why Laguna Beach voters may care
Official party positions—not voting instructions
California Democratic Party: supports Propositions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 37, 38 and 40; opposes 39, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 45. Official August 2 positions.
California Republican Party: supports Proposition 39 and opposes Propositions 4, 5 and 37. So Laguna matched CAGOP’s published initiative and legislative identifiers to the final numbers assigned by the Secretary of State; unlisted propositions are not inferred. Official CAGOP page.
Verified icons appear beside the applicable YES or NO line. Cards without a match link to the party’s current page without implying a position. Party positions describe organizations’ endorsements; they are not voting instructions or So Laguna recommendations.
Housing, development and environmental review
These measures have the most direct connection to Laguna Beach housing costs, local project review and development decisions.
1
Housing affordability bonds
YES:🫏 Allows $11.25 billion in state borrowing for affordable and veterans housing.
NO: Does not authorize that borrowing.
Laguna connection: State housing, homeownership and supporting-infrastructure funds can shape resources available to local and regional projects; awards are not guaranteed.Resident example: An income-qualified Laguna renter or first-time buyer would not automatically receive money. A local or regional housing project would first need to receive program funding, and the resident would still need to qualify.
Read the official analysis37
Middle-income homebuyer loan program
YES:🫏 Creates a homebuying-assistance program backed by up to $25 billion in revenue bonds, repaid through homeowner loans.
NO:🐘 Does not require the state to create the program.
Laguna connection: The program could matter to income-qualified buyers in a high-cost housing market, subject to eligibility and qualified-home rules.Resident example: An income-qualified Laguna buyer purchasing a qualifying newly built or converted home could apply for financing covering part of the purchase price. An ordinary resale home generally would not qualify.
Read the official analysis45
Environmental review for certain projects
YES: Makes certain projects eligible for new review rules, tighter timelines and narrower court challenges.
NO:🫏 Keeps current project-review and court-challenge procedures.
Laguna connection: Housing, school facilities and infrastructure projects can involve CEQA review, permits and public challenges.Resident example: A resident commenting on a qualifying housing, transportation, water, health or clean-energy project could face shorter review and lawsuit deadlines and fewer project alternatives being considered.
Read the official analysisElections and local government
These measures govern how Californians vote, how statewide recalls work and what local governments or voters may do in future elections.
4
Public campaign financing
YES:🫏 Lets state and local governments create limited public campaign-financing programs.
NO:🐘 Keeps the current prohibition for the state and most local governments.
Laguna connection: It would permit—but not automatically create—a future Laguna Beach public campaign-finance program.Resident example: Laguna Beach could later choose to create a public-financing program for local candidates, with eligibility and spending limits. This proposition would permit such a program; it would not create or fund one automatically.
Read the official analysis5
Statewide recall election process
YES:🫏 Removes the replacement-candidate question from statewide recalls; later elections or appointments generally fill vacancies.
NO:🐘 Keeps the replacement-candidate question on statewide recall ballots.
Laguna connection: Laguna Beach voters participate in statewide recall elections; this does not change local City Council recall rules.Resident example: If a governor were recalled, voters would no longer select a replacement on the same ballot. The lieutenant governor would generally complete the term, subject to the measure’s specific special-election rules.
Read the official analysis39
Government-issued voter identification
YES:🐘 Requires additional government-issued identifying information whenever a voter casts a ballot.
NO:🫏 Keeps signature-based identity verification.
Laguna connection: The new identification rules would apply directly to Laguna Beach voters in state and local elections.Resident example: An in-person voter would need to show government-issued identification, while a mail voter would provide the last four digits of an identifying number. The state would be required to offer voter-identification cards on request.
Read the official analysis43
Vote threshold for certain local taxes
YES: Requires two-thirds voter approval for certain local-government taxes.
NO:🫏 Retains majority approval for the affected taxes.
Laguna connection: It could change the approval threshold for future voter-proposed Laguna Beach or other local-government revenue measures.Resident example: A future citizen-proposed Laguna special tax for public safety, infrastructure or another dedicated service could receive a majority but still fail unless it reached two-thirds approval.
Read the official analysisSchools, health and the state budget
These measures concern state reserves, school and health funding, research bonds and nonprofit clinic spending.
2
State rainy-day fund
YES:🫏 Changes reserve and debt-payment rules, producing higher reserves and longer extra debt payments.
NO: Keeps current reserve and debt-payment rules.
Laguna connection: State budget stability can affect the reliability of funding for schools, health care, housing and other local-facing programs.Resident example: During a recession, larger state reserves could help stabilize funding that reaches local schools, health care and housing programs. Money placed in reserve, however, is not immediately available for other state spending.
Read the official analysis3
High-income tax for schools and health care
YES:🫏 Makes the existing high-income tax increase permanent.
NO: Lets the tax increase expire in 2031.
Laguna connection: The revenue supports statewide school and health programs, including systems serving Laguna Beach residents.Resident example: A Laguna taxpayer above the measure’s income thresholds would continue paying the existing additional tax after 2031. Other residents could be affected indirectly through school and health-care funding.
Read the official analysis38
Immunology medical-research bonds
YES:🫏 Allows $8.4 billion in state borrowing for immunology and immunotherapy research.
NO: Does not authorize that borrowing.
Laguna connection: It is a statewide borrowing and research-funding decision with potential regional health and university effects.Resident example: A local patient would not be guaranteed a treatment or grant. California universities or research institutes could receive bond funding, while the state budget would carry annual repayment costs.
Read the official analysis40
One-time tax on billionaires
YES:🫏 Collects a one-time state tax equal to 5 percent of specified billionaires’ wealth.
NO: Does not collect that tax.
Laguna connection: The measure would change state revenue and spending for public programs; the direct tax applies only to taxpayers who meet its criteria.Resident example: Only taxpayers and trusts with covered assets over $1 billion would directly owe the tax. Other residents could see indirect effects through health-care, food-assistance or education spending and changes in overall state revenue.
Read the official analysis44
Community health-clinic spending
YES: Requires certain nonprofit clinics to spend at least 90 percent of annual revenue on health-care services.
NO:🫏 Does not impose the new spending rule.
Laguna connection: It could affect qualifying safety-net clinics used by residents locally or elsewhere in the region; not every clinic is necessarily covered.Resident example: A resident using a covered federally qualified community health center could see the clinic direct more revenue toward patient and program services and less toward administration. Not every Laguna or Orange County provider would be covered.
Read the official analysisState tax and spending rules
These constitutional measures would change how California may design, review or account for certain future taxes.
41
Special-tax audits and state spending limit
YES: Adds state-auditor reviews for special-tax programs and may limit exclusions of new special-tax spending.
NO:🫏 Keeps current auditor duties and state spending-limit rules.
Laguna connection: It could shape statewide tax-funded programs and the public reporting available to California taxpayers.Resident example: Before voting on a future statewide special tax, residents could receive an audit of the programs slated to receive the money. The measure could also restrict keeping new state-tax revenue outside the spending limit.
Read the official analysis42
Personal-property and retroactive state taxes
YES: Bars new state taxes on ownership of financial assets and other personal property and restricts certain retroactive taxes.
NO:🫏 Preserves the state’s option to create those ownership taxes.
Laguna connection: It would limit future state tax policy for residents and businesses throughout California.Resident example: A resident would gain constitutional protection against a new state tax simply for owning investments, retirement assets or business interests, and against certain retroactive taxes. It would not repeal existing income, sales or real-property taxes.
Read the official analysisSource and method: Proposition titles and ballot status follow the California Secretary of State. Plain-language effects are condensed from the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office analyses. “Laguna connection” explains a plausible local pathway, and each resident example illustrates how the legal or financial change could be encountered. Examples are not predictions and do not mean a program, grant, tax or regulation will necessarily apply to a particular person, organization or project.
Election calendar
Laguna Beach election 2026 dates and voting information
- Today
California’s randomized alphabet drawing determines City Council candidate ballot order. - Today
County election officials begin mailing vote-by-mail ballots. - Today
Early voting begins at the Orange County Registrar of Voters office. - Today
Standard voter-registration deadline for the November election. - Today
Eleven-day Vote Centers open. - Today
Deadline to request a replacement vote-by-mail ballot. - Today
Four-day Vote Centers open. - Today
Election Day.
Follow the money
Campaign finance and endorsements
Laguna Beach limits contributions to a candidate for elective city office or a candidate-controlled committee to $500 per election, according to the City’s election page. This City Council hub summarizes each Council candidate’s filings using the same reporting periods and definitions.
For every City Council candidate, So Laguna publishes total contributions, total expenditures, cash on hand, outstanding debt, candidate loans or self-funding, unitemized contributions and source-linked itemized contributions when available. Independent expenditures are kept separate from candidate-controlled funds. Endorsements are kept separate from financial support.
How local government works
What does the Laguna Beach City Council control?
The five-member at-large Council performs the City’s legislative functions. Its decisions influence the municipal budget, ordinances, land-use policy, public safety, infrastructure, contracts, appointments and the direction given to city staff. Regular meetings are generally held at 5:00 p.m. on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, although exceptions occur.
City Council
Adopts ordinances, budgets and citywide policy; hears certain appeals and makes appointments.
Planning Commission
Reviews planning and land-use matters under authority assigned by law and City policy.
Design Review Board
Reviews projects subject to the City’s design-review requirements.
Arts Commission
Advises on arts programming, cultural policy and public-art matters.
Heritage Committee
Works on matters involving historic resources and preservation.
Housing and Human Services Committee
Advises on housing and community human-services priorities.
These are concise orientation summaries. The forthcoming /laguna-beach-government/ directory should provide each body’s legal authority, current members, terms, schedules, public-comment instructions, recent decisions and official records.
Frequently asked questions
Laguna Beach election questions and answers
When is the next Laguna Beach election?
The next Laguna Beach election is Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Eligible Orange County voters can also vote by mail, use a ballot drop box or vote early at a Vote Center.
How many Laguna Beach City Council seats are open in 2026?
Three of the five at-large Council seats are scheduled for election in 2026.
Does Laguna Beach elect Councilmembers by district?
No. Laguna Beach City Councilmembers are elected at large, meaning all eligible city voters can vote in the Council race.
Who is running for Laguna Beach City Council in 2026?
Nine candidates qualified, in official ballot order: Sue Kempf, Ashley Cintas, Laura Parisi, Mark Orgill, Nick Aronoff, Edward Bayuk, Joy Berry, Alex Rounaghi and Karen Martin.
How was the City Council candidate order determined?
California uses a randomized alphabet drawing to determine candidate order. The City Clerk published Laguna Beach’s official City Council ballot order on August 13, 2026, after the Secretary of State drawing; the order is not alphabetical, based on filing date or an editorial ranking.
What is Laguna Beach Ballot Measure E?
Measure E is a voter initiative proposing a limit of two consecutive four-year City Council terms, followed by a two-year break before a person could run for Council again. Its term count would apply prospectively rather than counting service before the measure.
When is the voter-registration deadline for the Laguna Beach election?
The standard registration deadline is October 19, 2026. Conditional same-day registration is available from October 20 through Election Day for eligible voters.
Can I vote anywhere in Orange County?
Orange County uses Vote Centers. Registered county voters may vote at any Orange County Vote Center rather than being limited to one traditional assigned polling place.
Where will Laguna Beach election results be posted?
The Orange County Registrar of Voters publishes the official current election results. So Laguna will link to that count and add local context without replacing the official source.
How So Laguna verifies the City Council voter guide
So Laguna prioritizes primary election records from the Laguna Beach City Clerk, Orange County Registrar of Voters, California Secretary of State and California Fair Political Practices Commission. City Council candidate biographies and stated positions are attributed to official candidate materials and are not presented as independently verified facts unless supported by additional records.
Every City Council candidate will be offered the same questionnaire and the same opportunity to request a factual correction. Campaign statements, third-party claims, endorsements and So Laguna commentary will be labeled. City Council candidate order will follow the official ballot—not editorial preference.
Primary source set: 2026 municipal election and candidate statements; City Clerk election portal; ballot measures; dated City Clerk announcement. Additional reporting: Orange County Register overview of 2026 city-council candidate fields.
Reporting and research: Michael Kovach, So Laguna
Last checked: September 14, 2026
Corrections and documents: michael@solaguna.com
So Laguna is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. This City Council guide is an informational resource and is not an official publication of the City of Laguna Beach or the Orange County Registrar of Voters.
Also on the 2026 ballot
Laguna Beach School Board election
Five candidates are seeking three LBUSD Board seats: Dee Perry, Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal, Kimberly Smith, Elizabeth Bates and Joan Malczewski. School Board coverage has its own detailed voter guide while remaining available here at the bottom of the general Election Hub.
Take the six-question School Board quiz →
Dee Perry
Current LBUSD Board Clerk; first elected in 2014
Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal
Non-incumbent; attorney, parent and longtime LBUSD volunteer
Kimberly Smith
Non-incumbent; technology executive and LBUSD parent
Elizabeth Bates
Non-incumbent; LBUSD graduate, parent and businesswoman
Joan Malczewski
Current LBUSD Board member; first elected in 2022
Cards follow the official Orange County ballot order. Select a profile for sourced background, priorities, the May 2026 Glass vote and campaign-finance records.
Incumbent School Board candidate voting records
The table covers incumbent candidates Dee Perry and Joan Malczewski using the same complete common-tenure window, source rules and procedural exclusions. Their profile pages separate the prior and current Board compositions and link every displayed position to the official record. Non-incumbents are not assigned hypothetical votes.
| Date and decision | Dee Perry | Joan Malczewski | Official record |
|---|---|---|---|
Motion to adopt the agenda with the addition of Superintendent and Bargaining Unit Reports. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to approve Consent Calendar Items B and C. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to reschedule the November 5, 2026 Board Governance Meeting to November 19, 2026. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to adopt the agenda. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to approve Resolution 26-08 Ordering a school bond election on November 3, 2026, and authorizing necessary actions in connection therewith. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to approve Resolution No. 26-07 to establish an interfund transfer of $4,500,000 from the Special Reserve Fund for Other Than Capital Outlay Projects to the General Fund for 2026-27. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to extend public comments was made at the 20-minute mark. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to extend the time for public comments. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to ratify the 2026-2029 Successor Agreement Comprehensive Tentative Agreement negotiated by the designated representatives of the Laguna Beach Unified Faculty Association (LaBUFA) and the Laguna Beach Unified School District. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to adopt the agenda with the removal of the approval of the VAPA Job Descriptions. | NO | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to adopt the agenda. | YES | NO | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Motion to approve consent calendar items B-U. | YES | YES | Meeting Official LBUSD voting record |
Verification notice: Source-linked records have not all been manually reviewed by So Laguna. Confirm details through the linked official record. “Not recorded” is not an abstention, absence or inferred position.
Compare the School Board candidates
Review ballot designations, experience, priorities, campaign information and candidate-by-candidate source records.
Jason Glass superintendent transition
See how the two incumbent candidates voted and how the three non-incumbents are identified in the coverage.
Editorial transparency
Election guide update log
This dated record tracks substantive changes to So Laguna’s nonpartisan Laguna Beach Election 2026 voter guide. Routine candidate-profile, campaign-finance and official-source updates are recorded here rather than turned into separate news articles. So Laguna publishes a standalone news report only when a development warrants additional reporting and context.
- Added both Kempf Forms 460: a new September 20–October 17 statement with $5,850 in period receipts, $44,602 calendar-year contributions and $28,042.29 ending cash, plus an amendment replacing filing 1112 without changing prior summary totals. Updated the comparison, candidate finance, sources and private filing ledger. Disclosed the $933.66 discrepancy between the reported year-to-date spending and the two periods added together; retained the filed figure without inferring a correction.
- Added six union PAC expenditure reports totaling $10,859.21, organization amendments and the Chamber debate archive. Corrected the Good Leadership Committee spending total to $99,950; its separate $100,000 contribution is unchanged.
- Added four reviewed Forms 496: $38,484.61 in new Good Leadership Committee spending supporting Kempf, Rounaghi and Orgill, bringing its reported cumulative spending to $99,950 (corrected October 16), plus Citizens for Laguna’s Future’s $2,000 media-production and video-editing expenditure opposing Measure E. Updated the comparison, three candidate profiles, both Measure E finance displays and private filing ledger with source links. Cumulative figures include earlier spending; outside expenditures stay separate from candidate donations and committee funding.
- Highlighted the verified $100,000 Regency Properties contribution to the shared committee supporting Kempf, Rounaghi and Orgill on the main finance comparison and all three profiles. Kept campaign receipts, shared committee funding and candidate-specific independent spending separate. Archived the completed October 6 South Laguna Civic forum and refreshed next-forum links: PTA School Board on October 7; Chamber City Council on October 15, with its published 6–9 p.m. schedule, Zoom registration and Cox channel 852 broadcast.
- Added NimbleGov PAC’s $2,842.19 final mailing payment, bringing the two October Measure E mailing payments to $5,684.37. Added Joy Berry’s $3,000 candidate-loan disclosure received October 2, separately from periodic totals. Linked Regency’s contributor-side report confirming the existing $100,000 committee contribution without double counting it. Replaced the outdated KXFM headline with the latest completed forum selected from the current schedule.
- Added the Laguna Canyon Conservancy’s September 28 full panel and closing statements, candidate answer links and searchable transcripts. Updated South Laguna Civic Association’s October 6 forum guide with the organizer’s RSVP email.
- Added reviewed Form 460 finance totals and links for Sue Kempf, Mark Orgill and Karen Martin. Updated the Measure E finance cards with NimbleGov PAC’s amended September 25 Form 460 and Citizens for Laguna’s Future’s new $1,000 Form 497 contribution from Steve Chadima, received after the September 19 reporting period. The NimbleGov amendment corrects an address without changing financial totals; the new contribution is shown separately from the earlier Form 460 totals.
- Added Laura Parisi’s filed Form 470 to her candidate profile and finance comparison without assigning a zero-dollar total. Updated Measure E finance with Citizens for Laguna’s Future’s Form 460 covering July 1–September 19, including $11,905.74 received, $11,016.07 spent during the period and $11,478.48 cash at period end; linked the complete filing and clarified that prior accelerated transaction reports are not additional money.
- Added KXFM’s organizer-published 10-question City Council results as a native yes/no comparison dashboard, linked each participant to a candidate profile and linked the transcription to KXFM’s original Facebook post. Updated the page title and search description to focus on the published questions and answers while retaining the short reel as a clip and stating that a complete replay has not been verified.
- Embedded KXFM’s organizer-published Facebook reel on the September 8 forum page and updated its search title, description, structured video data, FAQ and internal links for “Laguna Beach City Council forum KXFM,” without describing the reel as a complete recording. Expanded the dedicated Measure E record with sourced information about NimbleGov PAC, its identified leadership and initiative history; linked its campaign videos with an advocacy-source disclosure; and revised the support-side finance wording to distinguish the known supporting committee from filings not located in the City search results as of September 11.
- Expanded the completed CANDO candidate-forum page with neutral summaries of all seven answers from each of the nine City Council candidates, exact video timestamps and a searchable transcript of the complete recording. Added the same seven CANDO answer summaries and direct recording links to every individual Council candidate profile while retaining the earlier Village Laguna forum summaries.
- Added CANDO’s complete September 10 Laguna Beach City Council candidate-forum recording to its permanent So Laguna event page. Embedded the organizer-published 1:59:24 YouTube video, updated the page title and search description, added VideoObject structured data and promoted CANDO as the latest completed forum across the Election Hub, homepage and all nine Council candidate profiles. KXFM’s September 8 forum remains accurately labeled as awaiting a permanent audio or video replay. Added Citizens for Laguna’s Future’s newly filed Form 497 reporting a $1,000 contribution received from Patrick Quilter on September 9; the contribution is displayed separately from the committee’s earlier $2,500 independent expenditure against Measure E.
- Published Ashley Cintas’s complete response to So Laguna’s five-question City Council candidate questionnaire and added her candidate-supplied portrait throughout her profile, Election Hub, homepage candidate cards and forum candidate index. Added her candidate-supplied biography and attributed experience, updated seven issue summaries from her direct answers, and retained the same neutral disclosure and presentation used for other candidate responses. Added official Form 410 committee records for Mark Orgill, Joy Berry and Karen Martin. Marked the completed September 8 KXFM City Council and School Board forum as awaiting KXFM’s permanent audio or video recording and retained the official forum page across the Election Hub and applicable candidate profiles. Added the City Clerk’s newly listed September 15 Advocates for Laguna Residents City Council candidate forum at Council Chambers; a resident-supplied organizer notice describes the 6–8 p.m. event as focused on Laguna Beach hospital and emergency and acute-care services. Linked the sponsor’s City-filed Form 410 and 2026 Form 450 and identified it as general-purpose committee 1455392, with Alan Boinus as treasurer and principal officer.
- Expanded Dee Perry’s and Joan Malczewski’s source-linked LBUSD voting records to their complete common tenure beginning January 12, 2023. Applied identical inclusion rules to both incumbents and separated the records at December 16, 2024, when Sheri Morgan and Howard Hills took office, so different Board compositions are not blended. Preserved substantive decisions, consent-calendar actions, yes, no, abstain and absence records while uniformly excluding routine adjournment, recess, convening, return-to-open-session and call-to-order motions. Clarified that prevailing-side percentages are descriptive context, not candidate scores.
- Added Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal’s candidate-supplied portrait to her School Board profile and the shared candidate comparisons. Added the complete Village Laguna City Council candidate-forum recording, a searchable caption transcript and a neutral five-topic timestamp index for every Council candidate. Updated the Election Hub, all nine Council candidate profiles, forum cards and the So Laguna events calendar to link to the first-party video archive.
- Added the Laguna Beach Firefighters Association’s source-linked endorsements of Sue Kempf, Mark Orgill and Alex Rounaghi to the Election Hub and their candidate profiles. Reviewed every currently published candidate-controlled campaign website for other 2026 endorsements; older or undated endorsements were not carried forward without current verification. Updated every shared candidate-forum module to emphasize the next event, move completed events into a readable past-forums section and identify whether a recording or recap has been linked.
- Expanded the City-published independent candidate-forum schedule from five to eight events. Added CANDO’s September 10 virtual Laguna Canyon forum with its Zoom access and public question email; added the Laguna Canyon Conservancy’s September 28 forum and the South Laguna Civic Association’s October 6 forum; and corrected the Chamber forum from October 22 to October 15. Updated the Election Hub, all nine Council candidate profiles, homepage next-forum notice, forum article schedule, calendar and focused event pages from the shared source. The Conservancy’s own event page confirms Monday, September 28, with doors at 5:30 p.m. and the candidate panel from 6:30–8:30 p.m.
- Published complete School Board questionnaire responses from Dee Perry, Elizabeth Bates and Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal; added campaign-approved portraits and photographer credits for Perry and Bates; and updated their attributed backgrounds, priorities and superintendent-transition context. Elevated Monday’s Village Laguna candidate forum near the top of the hub. Added a neutral Yes/No effect and a concrete resident example to every statewide proposition. Added source-linked official party-position icons; crosswalked CAGOP’s published identifiers to verified positions on Propositions 4, 5, 37 and 39, while unlisted measures link to the party source without inferring a position. Added balanced Measure E finance cards for supporting and opposing spending, including Citizens for Laguna’s Future’s August 27 Form 496 reporting a $2,500 independent expenditure against the measure.
- Added neutral summaries of all 14 certified statewide propositions, including a specific explanation of each measure’s possible Laguna Beach connection and direct links to the Secretary of State and Legislative Analyst’s Office. Added the City-listed candidate-forum schedule then available to the Election Hub, all nine Council profiles and the So Laguna events calendar; the August 31 update above supersedes that initial schedule. Reviewed all nine City Council profiles against official City records and candidate-controlled sources; added concise candidate-specific summaries and direct City Clerk Form 501 and available Form 410/460 indexes. Expanded Nick Aronoff’s profile with his public campaign Instagram, a candidate interview and a sourced Laguna Canyon Road public comment. Updated Ashley Cintas’s profile and the finance comparison with her verified $7,000 Form 497 transaction. Published Kimberly Smith’s complete candidate response, added consistent factual role pills to School Board profiles and linked named organizations to their official pages. The guide distinguishes accelerated contribution reports from complete periodic totals.
- Expanded the Laguna Beach School Board candidate guide with official ballot order, campaign-disclosure status and source-linked LBUSD voting records. Refined candidate-specific search titles, descriptions, authorship, Article schema and breadcrumb data across all 14 local candidate profiles.
- Added source-linked voting-record comparisons for incumbent Laguna Beach City Council and LBUSD School Board candidates. Connected the election guide to the City meeting archive, municipal and school budgets, public-employee compensation, demographics and issue guides.
- Added the School Board election overview and profiles for Dee Perry, Shaheen Sheik-Sadhal, Kimberly Smith, Elizabeth Bates and Joan Malczewski. Expanded the general election hub with Measure E term-limit information, LBUSD campaign-finance records and neutral context about the superintendent transition.
- Updated Mark Orgill’s City Council candidate profile to separate current public roles from former affiliations and added direct links to the relevant Laguna Beach government committee records.
- Expanded the nine City Council candidate profiles with official candidate-statement summaries, Form 700 economic-interest records, community and business roles, candidate photo galleries, sourced issue positions and campaign social links. Added Mark Orgill’s questionnaire responses and extended biography.
- Published the unified Laguna Beach Election 2026 hub, homepage election overview, official City Council ballot order, candidate navigation and key voting dates for the November 3, 2026 general municipal election.
- Launched So Laguna’s sourced 2026 City Council candidate profiles and campaign-finance comparison for Sue Kempf, Ashley Cintas, Laura Parisi, Mark Orgill, Nick Aronoff, Edward Bayuk, Joy Berry, Alex Rounaghi and Karen Martin.
Last substantively updated: September 14, 2026.